Usage Score
9.6
Player Dossier
2024-2025Pittsburgh
Cameron Monteiro
WR • 6'1" • 180 lbs • Brockton, MA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Cameron Monteiro reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
84
Consistency
49.8
Season Value
60.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Akron
2425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh • Akron
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cameron Monteiro, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Akron. Cameron Monteiro reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Akron paired 109 primary output with 84 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 84 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Pittsburgh, Akron.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Akron
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
21.8
Efficiency
84
Usage
9.6
Consistency
49.8
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 16. UAB: 12. Toledo: 8. Central Michigan: 26. Miami (OH): 47
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 1 by 100. UAB: 1 by 80. Toledo: 1 by 53.3. Central Michigan: 2 by 86.7. Miami (OH): 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Losses20.8 · n=4
First Half12 · n=3 · -24.5 vs Second Half
Second Half36.5 · n=2 · +24.5 vs First Half
All Games21.8 · n=5
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami (OH)
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2024
Opening stop
- 2
Akron
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Akron | 109 | 84 | 9.6 | 109 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
47
Primary metric
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Central Michigan
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
Nebraska
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Toledo
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Akron
109 primary output · 84 efficiency · 9.6 usage
60.6
#2
2024 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
109
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 5 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.