Usage Score
12.5
Player Dossier
2025-2025UTSA
AJ Wilson
WR • 6'2" • 190 lbs • Huntsville, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
AJ Wilson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.7
Consistency
50.3
Season Value
62.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · UTSA
2525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
AJ Wilson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · UTSA. AJ Wilson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
UTSA paired 523 primary output with 85.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · UTSA
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
47.5
Efficiency
85.7
Usage
12.5
Consistency
50.3
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 24. Texas A&M: 34. Texas State: 18. Unknown: 99. Temple: 67. Rice: 77. North Texas: 35. South Florida: 26. Charlotte: 87. East Carolina: 18. Army: 38
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 3 by 53.3. Texas A&M: 1 by 100. Texas State: 1 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 100. Temple: 3 by 100. Rice: 2 by 100. North Texas: 4 by 58.3. South Florida: 2 by 86.7. Charlotte: 5 by 100. East Carolina: 2 by 60. Army: 3 by 84.4
Split Comparison
Wins51.5 · n=4 · +15.2 vs Losses
Losses36.3 · n=6 · -15.2 vs Wins
First Half53.2 · n=6 · +12.4 vs Second Half
Second Half40.8 · n=5 · -12.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Charlotte
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs Florida International | W 57-20 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Army | L 24-27 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs East Carolina | W 58-24 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Charlotte | W 28-7 | — | 5 | 87 | 17.4 | 17.40 | 0 | 43 |
| Fri 11/7 | @ South Florida | L 23-55 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ North Texas | L 17-55 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Rice | W 61-13 | — | 2 | 77 | 38.5 | 38.50 | 1 | 57 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Temple | L 21-27 | — | 3 | 67 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 99 | 20.8 | 24.80 | 1 | 77 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Texas State | L 36-43 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Texas A&M | L 24-42 | — | 1 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 1 | 34 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | UTSA | 523 | 85.7 | 12.5 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | UTSA | 523 | 85.7 | 12.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
71
Primary metric
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
99
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Charlotte
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Temple
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · UTSA
523 primary output · 85.7 efficiency · 12.5 usage
62.1
#2
2025 Regular Season · UTSA
62.1
523 primary · 85.7 efficiency · 12.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
523
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 12 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.