Usage Score
22.3
Player Dossier
2022-2025Hawai'i
Alex Perry
WR • 6'5" • 210 lbs • Port Charlotte, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Alex Perry reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.5
Consistency
68.5
Season Value
67.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Florida International
2223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Hawai'i • Florida International
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Sam Houston
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alex Perry, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Florida International. Alex Perry reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Florida International paired 840 primary output with 79.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Hawai'i, Florida International.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Sam Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Florida International
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
64.6
Efficiency
79.5
Usage
22.3
Consistency
68.5
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTSA: 24. Unknown: 17. Penn State: 15. Florida Atlantic: 46. Delaware: 84. UConn: 32. Western Kentucky: 86. Kennesaw State: 75. Missouri State: 53. Middle Tennessee: 71. Liberty: 88. Jacksonville State: 109. Sam Houston: 140
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTSA: 3 by 53.3. Unknown: 3 by 37.8. Penn State: 2 by 50. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 100. Delaware: 5 by 100. UConn: 4 by 53.3. Western Kentucky: 3 by 100. Kennesaw State: 7 by 71.4. Missouri State: 3 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 94.7. Liberty: 8 by 73.3. Jacksonville State: 4 by 100. Sam Houston: 7 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins90 · n=6 · +42.8 vs Losses
Losses47.2 · n=6 · -42.8 vs Wins
First Half43.4 · n=7 · -45.9 vs Second Half
Second Half89.3 · n=6 · +45.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Sam Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs Sam Houston
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | @ UTSA | L 20-57 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Sam Houston100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 56-16 | — | 7 | 140 | 20 | 20 | 2 | 35 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Jacksonville State100 receiving yards | W 27-21 | — | 4 | 109 | 27.3 | 27.30 | 1 | 64 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs LibertyHigh volume | W 34-27 | — | 8 | 88 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Middle Tennessee2+ TD | W 56-30 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 2 | 20 |
| Thu 10/30 | @ Missouri State | L 21-28 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 1 | 25 |
| Tue 10/21 | vs Kennesaw State | L 26-45 | — | 7 | 75 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 35 |
| Wed 10/15 | @ Western Kentucky | W 25-6 | — | 3 | 86 | 28.7 | 28.70 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ UConn | L 10-51 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Delaware | L 16-38 | — | 5 | 84 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 1 | 47 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 38-28 | — | 2 | 46 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Penn State | L 0-34 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Hawai'i
2022-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Florida International
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Hawai'i | 19 | 63.3 | 10 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Hawai'i | 277 | 69.7 | 10.2 | 258 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Hawai'i | 195 | 57 | 8.5 | -82 |
| 2025 Postseason | Florida International | 840 | 79.5 | 22.3 | 645 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Florida International | 840 | 79.5 | 22.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Sam Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
140
Primary metric
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Jacksonville State
109
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Vanderbilt
51
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 85 efficiency score.
#4
Boise State
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 63.3 efficiency score.
#5
Delaware
84
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Florida International
840 primary output · 79.5 efficiency · 22.3 usage
67.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · Florida International
67.6
840 primary · 79.5 efficiency · 22.3 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Hawai'i
46.1
277 primary · 69.7 efficiency · 10.2 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,331
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 35 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.