Usage Score
9.6
Player Dossier
2023-2025Sam Houston
Caleb Weaver
S • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Caleb Weaver shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
33.6
Consistency
37.6
Season Value
23.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Sam Houston
2324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Sam Houston • Duke
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Caleb Weaver, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Sam Houston. Caleb Weaver shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Sam Houston paired 12.5 primary output with 40.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 33.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Sam Houston, Duke.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Duke
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
33.6
Usage
9.6
Consistency
37.6
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 1. Unknown: 0. Illinois: 1. Tulane: 0.5. NC State: 0.5. Syracuse: 2. California: 0. Georgia Tech: 2. Clemson: 0. UConn: 2. Virginia: 0. North Carolina: 0. Wake Forest: 0. Virginia: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 8 by 43.3. Unknown: 4 by 16.7. Illinois: 9 by 47.5. Tulane: 6 by 30. NC State: 11 by 50.8. Syracuse: 6 by 45. California: 3 by 12.5. Georgia Tech: 10 by 61.7. Clemson: 7 by 29.2. UConn: 5 by 40.8. Virginia: 9 by 37.5. North Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Wake Forest: 5 by 20.8. Virginia: 4 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Wins0.6 · n=8 · -0.5 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · n=5 · +0.5 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · n=7 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.7 · n=7 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Best efficiency game
61.7 vs Georgia Tech
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | vs Arizona State | W 42-39 | 8 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/7 | @ Virginia | W 27-20 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Wake Forest | W 49-32 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | @ North Carolina | W 32-25 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Virginia | L 17-34 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ UConn | L 34-37 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Clemson | W 46-45 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Georgia Tech10+ tackles · Splash game | L 18-27 | 10 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/5 | @ California | W 45-21 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Syracuse | W 38-3 | 6 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs NC State10+ tackles | W 45-33 | 11 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/14 | @ Tulane | L 27-34 | 6 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Illinois | L 19-45 | 9 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 8/28 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Sam Houston
2023-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Duke
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Sam Houston | 7 | 24.1 | 12.7 | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Sam Houston | 12.5 | 40.7 | 9.1 | 5.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Sam Houston | 12.5 | 40.7 | 9.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Duke | 10 | 33.6 | 9.6 | -2.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Duke | 10 | 33.6 | 9.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Kentucky
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 80 takeover score.
#2
Georgia Tech
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 62.1 takeover score.
#3
Hawai'i
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.3 takeover score.
#4
Syracuse
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.2 takeover score.
#5
UConn
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Sam Houston
12.5 primary output · 40.7 efficiency · 9.1 usage
28.9
#2
2024 Regular Season · Sam Houston
28.9
12.5 primary · 40.7 efficiency · 9.1 usage
#3
2025 Postseason · Duke
23.1
10 primary · 33.6 efficiency · 9.6 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
3
Splash games
6
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
228
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 38 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.