Usage Score
42.5
Player Dossier
2022-2024Bowling Green
Harold Fannin Jr.
TE • 6'4" • 230 lbs • Canton, OH, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Harold Fannin Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.3
Consistency
72.1
Season Value
74.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Bowling Green
222223232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Harold Fannin Jr., TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Bowling Green. Harold Fannin Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Bowling Green paired 1,550 primary output with 82.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Bowling Green
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
119.2
Efficiency
82.3
Usage
42.5
Consistency
72.1
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 213. Unknown: 67. Penn State: 137. Texas A&M: 145. Old Dominion: 188. Akron: 135. Northern Illinois: 25. Kent State: 171. Toledo: 74. Central Michigan: 86. Western Michigan: 137. Ball State: 125. Miami (OH): 47
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 17 by 83.5. Unknown: 6 by 74.4. Penn State: 11 by 83. Texas A&M: 8 by 100. Old Dominion: 12 by 100. Akron: 9 by 100. Northern Illinois: 4 by 41.7. Kent State: 10 by 100. Toledo: 6 by 82.2. Central Michigan: 7 by 81.9. Western Michigan: 10 by 91.3. Ball State: 9 by 92.6. Miami (OH): 8 by 39.2
Split Comparison
Wins121.3 · n=6 · -4.5 vs Losses
Losses125.8 · n=6 · +4.5 vs Wins
First Half130 · n=7 · +23.3 vs Second Half
Second Half106.7 · n=6 · -23.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | vs Arkansas State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 31-38 | — | 17 | 213 | 12.3 | 12.50 | 1 | 35 |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Miami (OH)High volume | L 12-28 | — | 8 | 47 | 5.3 | 5.90 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Ball State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-13 | — | 9 | 125 | 12.7 | 13.90 | 1 | 37 |
| Wed 11/13 | vs Western Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-13 | — | 10 | 137 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 2 | 29 |
| Wed 11/6 | @ Central Michigan | W 23-13 | — | 7 | 86 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Toledo | W 41-26 | — | 6 | 74 | 10.8 | 12.30 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Kent State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-6 | — | 10 | 171 | 17.1 | 17.10 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Northern Illinois | L 7-17 | — | 4 | 25 | 5 | 6.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Akron100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-20 | — | 9 | 135 | 15.6 | 15 | 0 | 63 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Old Dominion100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-30 | — | 12 | 188 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 2 | 59 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Texas A&M100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-26 | — | 8 | 145 | 18.1 | 18.10 | 1 | 65 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Penn State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-34 | — | 11 | 137 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 32 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2022-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
202220222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Postseason | Bowling Green | 218 | 65 | 11.3 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 218 | 65 | 11.3 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Bowling Green | 623 | 76.6 | 24.3 | 405 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 623 | 76.6 | 24.3 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Bowling Green | 1,550 | 82.3 | 42.5 | 927 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 1,550 | 82.3 | 42.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
213
Primary metric
213 receiving yards with a 83.5 efficiency score.
#2
Old Dominion
188
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
188 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
109
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kent State
171
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
171 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
137
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 91.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Bowling Green
1,550 primary output · 82.3 efficiency · 42.5 usage
74.2
#2
2024 Regular Season · Bowling Green
74.2
1,550 primary · 82.3 efficiency · 42.5 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Bowling Green
50.8
623 primary · 76.6 efficiency · 24.3 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
10
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,391
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.