Usage Score
11.9
Player Dossier
2022-2025UL Monroe
Kenard Snyder
DE • 6'0" • 248 lbs • Vero Beach, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Kenard Snyder shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
20.4
Consistency
12.8
Season Value
16.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · UL Monroe
2223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UL Monroe • Iowa State • Texas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kenard Snyder, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · UL Monroe. Kenard Snyder shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
UL Monroe paired 22 primary output with 39.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 20.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across UL Monroe, Iowa State, Texas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: James Madison
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 84.6th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Texas State
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
20.4
Usage
11.9
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 3. Eastern Michigan: 0. UTSA: 3. Arizona State: 0. Unknown: 0. Arkansas State: 0. Troy: 0.5. Marshall: 0. James Madison: 2. Louisiana: 0. Southern Miss: 0. UL Monroe: 1.5. South Alabama: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 5 by 50.8. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 12.5. UTSA: 4 by 46.7. Arizona State: 6 by 25. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. Arkansas State: 1 by 4.2. Troy: 2 by 13.3. Marshall: 1 by 4.2. James Madison: 2 by 28.3. Louisiana: 2 by 8.3. Southern Miss: 1 by 4.2. UL Monroe: 5 by 35.8. South Alabama: 2 by 28.3
Split Comparison
Wins1.6 · n=6 · +1.2 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · n=6 · -1.2 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · +0.0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.9 · n=6 · -0.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
James Madison
Best efficiency game
50.8 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/2 | vs RiceSplash game | W 41-10 | 5 | 4 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | vs South Alabama | W 49-26 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs UL Monroe | W 31-14 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Southern Miss | W 41-14 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Louisiana | L 39-42 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 10/29 | vs James Madison | L 20-52 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Marshall | L 37-40 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/12 | vs Troy | L 41-48 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Arkansas State | L 30-31 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/14 | @ Arizona State | L 15-34 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | @ UTSASplash game | W 43-36 | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 52-27 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UL Monroe
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Iowa State
2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Texas State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | UL Monroe | 10.5 | 29.2 | 8.1 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | UL Monroe | 22 | 39.2 | 13.3 | 11.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Iowa State | 4 | 14.7 | 6 | -18 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas State | 12 | 20.4 | 11.9 | 8 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas State | 12 | 20.4 | 11.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas State
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 65.5 takeover score.
#2
Ole Miss
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.6 takeover score.
#3
James Madison
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 59.4 takeover score.
#4
Southern Miss
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 58 takeover score.
#5
Arkansas State
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · UL Monroe
22 primary output · 39.2 efficiency · 13.3 usage
37.1
#2
2022 Regular Season · UL Monroe
21.9
10.5 primary · 29.2 efficiency · 8.1 usage
#3
2025 Postseason · Texas State
16.2
12 primary · 20.4 efficiency · 11.9 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
8
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
3
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
162
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 42 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.