Usage Score
49.5
Player Profile
Eli Heidenreich
WR • 6'0" • 206 lbs • Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Eli Heidenreich reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.4
Consistency
56.4
Season Value
65.8
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Navy
222324242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Navy
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Navy
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Eli Heidenreich, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Navy. Eli Heidenreich reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Navy paired 941 primary output with 86.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Navy
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
72.4
Efficiency
86.4
Usage
49.5
Consistency
56.4
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 64. Unknown: 65. UAB: 21. Tulsa: 40. Rice: 44. Air Force: 243. Temple: 72. Florida Atlantic: 22. North Texas: 68. Notre Dame: 20. South Florida: 146. Memphis: 64. Army: 72
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 5 by 85.3. Unknown: 6 by 72.2. UAB: 2 by 70. Tulsa: 2 by 100. Rice: 2 by 100. Air Force: 8 by 100. Temple: 3 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 73.3. North Texas: 6 by 75.6. Notre Dame: 2 by 66.7. South Florida: 5 by 100. Memphis: 2 by 100. Army: 6 by 80
Split Comparison
Wins78.8 · n=10 · +34.8 vs Losses
Losses44 · n=2 · -34.8 vs Wins
First Half78.4 · n=7 · +13.1 vs Second Half
Second Half65.3 · n=6 · -13.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/2 | @ Cincinnati | W 35-13 | — | 5 | 64 | 8.4 | 12.80 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 12/13 | vs Army | W 17-16 | — | 6 | 72 | 9.1 | 12 | 1 | 21 |
| Fri 11/28 | @ Memphis | W 28-17 | — | 2 | 64 | 9.6 | 32 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Florida100 receiving yards | W 41-38 | — | 5 | 146 | 16.8 | 29.20 | 0 | 82 |
| Sun 11/9 | @ Notre Dame | L 10-49 | — | 2 | 20 | 11.7 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ North Texas | L 17-31 | — | 6 | 68 | 8.9 | 11.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 42-32 | — | 2 | 22 | 5.1 | 11 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Temple | W 32-31 | — | 3 | 72 | 13.3 | 24 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Air Force100 receiving yards · High volume | W 34-31 | — | 8 | 243 | 30.4 | 30.40 | 3 | 80 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Rice | W 21-13 | — | 2 | 44 | 8.4 | 22 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 9/14 | @ Tulsa | W 42-23 | — | 2 | 40 | 11.2 | 20 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs UAB | W 38-24 | — | 2 | 21 | 9.8 | 10.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 65 | 9 | 10.80 | 1 | 35 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Navy
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202220232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Navy | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Navy | 382 | 78.1 | 23.2 | 382 |
| 2024 Postseason | Navy | 671 | 79.1 | 40.6 | 289 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Navy | 671 | 79.1 | 40.6 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Navy | 941 | 86.4 | 49.5 | 270 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Navy | 941 | 86.4 | 49.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Temple
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
98
Primary metric
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Air Force
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Air Force
243
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
243 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Temple
63
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Navy
941 primary output · 86.4 efficiency · 49.5 usage
65.8
#2
2025 Regular Season · Navy
65.8
941 primary · 86.4 efficiency · 49.5 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Navy
58
671 primary · 79.1 efficiency · 40.6 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,994
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.