Usage Score
33.1
Player Dossier
2022-2025Navy
Blake Horvath
QB • 6'2" • 195 lbs • Hilliard, OH, USA
Dual-threat creatorVolume operator
Blake Horvath is a dual-threat creator with 39.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
69.9
Consistency
74.2
Season Value
68.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Navy
222324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Navy
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Blake Horvath, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Navy. Blake Horvath is a dual-threat creator with 39.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Navy paired 2,780 primary output with 69.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 69.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Navy
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
217.3
Efficiency
69.9
Usage
33.1
Consistency
74.2
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 247. Unknown: 141. Temple: 234. Memphis: 403. UAB: 309. Air Force: 249. Charlotte: 173. Notre Dame: 217. Rice: 184. South Florida: 114. Tulane: 25. Army: 311
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 30 by 77.1. Unknown: 19 by 61.8. Temple: 24 by 84.2. Memphis: 24 by 93.8. UAB: 24 by 86.6. Air Force: 34 by 73.7. Charlotte: 26 by 68. Notre Dame: 27 by 67.9. Rice: 37 by 49.3. South Florida: 30 by 57. Tulane: 6 by 37.5. Army: 34 by 81.3
Split Comparison
Wins255 · n=8 · +113 vs Losses
Losses142 · n=3 · -113 vs Wins
First Half263.8 · n=6 · +93.2 vs Second Half
Second Half170.7 · n=6 · -93.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
93.8 vs Memphis
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | vs OklahomaDual-threat | W 21-20 | 7 | 12 | 92 | 58.3 | 0 | 0 | 77.1 | 18 | 155 | 8.60 | 2 | 95 |
| Sat 12/14 | @ Army3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 31-13 | 4 | 9 | 107 | 44.4 | 2 | 0 | 81.3 | 25 | 204 | 8.20 | 2 | 48 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Tulane | L 0-35 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 37.5 | 5 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ South FloridaDual-threat | W 28-7 | 6 | 11 | 58 | 54.5 | 1 | 0 | 57 | 19 | 56 | 2.90 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ RiceDual-threat | L 10-24 | 10 | 21 | 120 | 47.6 | 0 | 2 | 49.3 | 16 | 64 | 4 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Notre DameDual-threat | L 14-51 | 7 | 13 | 88 | 53.8 | 0 | 1 | 67.9 | 14 | 129 | 9.20 | 1 | 60 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Charlotte3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 51-17 | 7 | 13 | 117 | 53.8 | 3 | 0 | 68 | 13 | 56 | 4.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Air ForceDual-threat | W 34-7 | 9 | 15 | 134 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 73.7 | 19 | 115 | 6.10 | 2 | 17 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ UAB3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 41-18 | 9 | 11 | 225 | 81.8 | 2 | 0 | 86.6 | 13 | 84 | 6.50 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Memphis3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 56-44 | 9 | 12 | 192 | 75.0 | 2 | 0 | 93.8 | 12 | 211 | 17.60 | 4 | 90 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Temple3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 38-11 | 5 | 9 | 112 | 55.6 | 1 | 0 | 84.2 | 15 | 122 | 8.10 | 3 | 62 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 7 | 12 | 108 | 58.3 | 2 | 1 | 61.8 | 7 | 33 | 4.70 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Navy
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202220232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Navy | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Navy | 267 | 50.5 | 17.6 | 267 |
| 2024 Postseason | Navy | 2,607 | 69.9 | 33.1 | 2,340 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Navy | 2,607 | 69.9 | 33.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Navy | 2,780 | 69.3 | 39.2 | 173 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Navy | 2,780 | 69.3 | 39.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Air Force
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
469
Primary metric
469 total offense with 88.3 efficiency.
#2
Memphis
403
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
403 total offense with 93.8 efficiency.
#3
Army
311
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
311 total offense with 81.3 efficiency.
#4
South Florida
135
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
135 total offense with 79.7 efficiency.
#5
UAB
309
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
309 total offense with 86.6 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Navy
2,780 primary output · 69.3 efficiency · 39.2 usage
71.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · Navy
71.4
2,780 primary · 69.3 efficiency · 39.2 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Navy
68.9
2,607 primary · 69.9 efficiency · 33.1 usage
Milestones
8
250+ passing yards
4
300+ total offense
3
3+ takeover TD games
19
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
5,654
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 28 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.