Usage Score
11.2
Player Dossier
2022-2025Navy
Nathan Kent
WR • 6'3" • 180 lbs • Rocklin, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Nathan Kent reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
93.3
Consistency
47.4
Season Value
44.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Navy
2223242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Navy
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nathan Kent, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Navy. Nathan Kent reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Navy paired 222 primary output with 69.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 93.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Navy
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
22.7
Efficiency
93.3
Usage
11.2
Consistency
47.4
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 12. Rice: 15. Air Force: 41
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 80. Rice: 1 by 100. Air Force: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins28 · n=2
First Half13.5 · n=2
All Games22.7 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
100 vs Air Force
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Navy
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20222023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Navy | 32 | 100 | 25 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Navy | 86 | 75 | 14.9 | 54 |
| 2024 Postseason | Navy | 222 | 69.2 | 15.7 | 136 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Navy | 222 | 69.2 | 15.7 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Navy | 68 | 93.3 | 11.2 | -154 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32
Primary metric
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
45
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UAB
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Air Force
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
East Carolina
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Navy
222 primary output · 69.2 efficiency · 15.7 usage
50
#2
2024 Regular Season · Navy
50
222 primary · 69.2 efficiency · 15.7 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Navy
44.9
68 primary · 93.3 efficiency · 11.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
408
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.