Usage Score
23.2
Player Dossier
2022-2025Clemson
Antonio Williams
WR • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Irmo, SC, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Antonio Williams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.9
Consistency
64.1
Season Value
64.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Clemson
22222323242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Clemson
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Antonio Williams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Clemson. Antonio Williams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Clemson paired 902 primary output with 79.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Clemson
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
64.4
Efficiency
79.9
Usage
23.2
Consistency
64.1
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 66. Georgia: 76. App State: 44. NC State: 39. Stanford: 37. Florida State: 84. Wake Forest: 69. Virginia: 44. Louisville: 25. Virginia Tech: 48. Pittsburgh: 149. Unknown: 72. South Carolina: 99. SMU: 50
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 4 by 100. Georgia: 6 by 84.4. App State: 3 by 97.8. NC State: 3 by 86.7. Stanford: 4 by 61.7. Florida State: 3 by 100. Wake Forest: 6 by 76.7. Virginia: 3 by 97.8. Louisville: 6 by 27.8. Virginia Tech: 5 by 64. Pittsburgh: 13 by 76.4. Unknown: 5 by 96. South Carolina: 8 by 82.5. SMU: 5 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Wins62.7 · n=9 · -3.8 vs Losses
Losses66.5 · n=4 · +3.8 vs Wins
First Half59.3 · n=7 · -10.3 vs Second Half
Second Half69.6 · n=7 · +10.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ Texas | L 24-38 | — | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Sun 12/8 | @ SMU | W 34-31 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs South CarolinaHigh volume | L 14-17 | — | 8 | 99 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 5 | 72 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 2 | 30 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Pittsburgh100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-20 | — | 13 | 149 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 2 | 28 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Virginia Tech | W 24-14 | — | 5 | 48 | 8.3 | 9.60 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Louisville | L 21-33 | — | 6 | 25 | 4.6 | 4.20 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Virginia | W 48-31 | — | 3 | 44 | 20 | 14.70 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Wake Forest | W 49-14 | — | 6 | 69 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Florida State | W 29-13 | — | 3 | 84 | 24 | 28 | 1 | 57 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Stanford | W 40-14 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.8 | 9.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs NC State2+ TD | W 59-35 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 2 | 31 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs App State | W 66-20 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Georgia | L 3-34 | — | 6 | 76 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 36 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2022202220232023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Postseason | Clemson | 598 | 68.4 | 19.9 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Clemson | 598 | 68.4 | 19.9 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Clemson | 208 | 64.2 | 15.8 | -390 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Clemson | 208 | 64.2 | 15.8 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Clemson | 902 | 79.9 | 23.2 | 694 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Clemson | 902 | 79.9 | 23.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Clemson | 604 | 70.2 | 24.2 | -298 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Duke
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
142
Primary metric
142 receiving yards with a 94.7 efficiency score.
#2
Pittsburgh
149
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
149 receiving yards with a 76.4 efficiency score.
#3
Louisville
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 55.3 efficiency score.
#4
Florida State
76
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
64
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 85.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Clemson
902 primary output · 79.9 efficiency · 23.2 usage
64.1
#2
2024 Regular Season · Clemson
64.1
902 primary · 79.9 efficiency · 23.2 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Clemson
55.8
604 primary · 70.2 efficiency · 24.2 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9731
Dutch Fork · Irmo, SC
- Committed To
- Clemson
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,312
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.