Usage Score
25.4
Player Dossier
2022-2025Tennessee
Squirrel White
WR • 5'10" • 170 lbs • Birmingham, AL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Squirrel White reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71.9
Consistency
57.6
Season Value
63.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Tennessee
22222323242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Tennessee • Florida State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Squirrel White, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Tennessee. Squirrel White reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Tennessee paired 804 primary output with 71.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tennessee, Florida State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 84.6th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Tennessee
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
61.8
Efficiency
71.9
Usage
25.4
Consistency
57.6
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 39. Virginia: 45. Unknown: 30. Florida: 68. UTSA: 29. South Carolina: 104. Texas A&M: 29. Alabama: 111. Kentucky: 47. UConn: 94. Missouri: 53. Georgia: 45. Vanderbilt: 110
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 3 by 86.7. Virginia: 6 by 50. Unknown: 4 by 50. Florida: 3 by 100. UTSA: 4 by 48.3. South Carolina: 9 by 77. Texas A&M: 3 by 64.4. Alabama: 10 by 74. Kentucky: 5 by 62.7. UConn: 2 by 100. Missouri: 4 by 88.3. Georgia: 5 by 60. Vanderbilt: 10 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins62.1 · n=8 · -7.1 vs Losses
Losses69.3 · n=4 · +7.1 vs Wins
First Half49.1 · n=7 · -27.5 vs Second Half
Second Half76.7 · n=6 · +27.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs UConn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | vs Iowa | W 35-0 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Vanderbilt100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-24 | — | 10 | 110 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Georgia | L 10-38 | — | 5 | 45 | 8.8 | 9 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Missouri | L 7-36 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs UConn | W 59-3 | — | 2 | 94 | 47 | 47 | 1 | 83 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Kentucky | W 33-27 | — | 5 | 47 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Alabama100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-34 | — | 10 | 111 | 11.1 | 11.10 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Texas A&M | W 20-13 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs South Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-20 | — | 9 | 104 | 10.9 | 11.60 | 0 | 50 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs UTSA | W 45-14 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Florida | L 16-29 | — | 3 | 68 | 22.7 | 22.70 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Virginia | W 49-13 | — | 6 | 45 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tennessee
2022-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Florida State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2022202220232023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Postseason | Tennessee | 481 | 71.5 | 18.3 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tennessee | 481 | 71.5 | 18.3 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Tennessee | 804 | 71.9 | 25.4 | 323 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Tennessee | 804 | 71.9 | 25.4 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Tennessee | 381 | 70 | 18.1 | -423 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Tennessee | 381 | 70 | 18.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Florida State | 52 | 40.9 | 9.1 | -329 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71
Primary metric
71 receiving yards with a 94.7 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
122
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Clemson
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
South Carolina
104
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 77 efficiency score.
#5
Mississippi State
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Tennessee
804 primary output · 71.9 efficiency · 25.4 usage
63.7
#2
2023 Regular Season · Tennessee
63.7
804 primary · 71.9 efficiency · 25.4 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Tennessee
52.2
481 primary · 71.5 efficiency · 18.3 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,718
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 41 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.