Usage Score
7.4
Player Dossier
2023-2025East Carolina
TE • 6'3" • 230 lbs • Apopka, FL, USA
Antonio Ferguson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
7.4
Efficiency
71.7
Consistency
68.7
Season Value
61.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Antonio Ferguson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UAB. Antonio Ferguson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
UAB paired 115 primary output with 71.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 71.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across East Carolina, Florida International, UAB.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
19.2
Efficiency
71.7
Usage
7.4
Consistency
68.7
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 18. Florida Atlantic: 30. Memphis: 8. UConn: 17. South Florida: 34. Tulsa: 8
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 1 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 66.7. Memphis: 1 by 53.3. UConn: 2 by 56.7. South Florida: 2 by 100. Tulsa: 1 by 53.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Florida
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Florida
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
East Carolina
2023
Opening stop
Florida International
2024
Peak year stop
UAB
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | East Carolina | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Florida International | 90 | 63.3 | 7.2 | 90 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UAB | 115 | 71.7 | 7.4 | 25 |
#1 Featured game
Jacksonville State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42
Primary metric
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Florida
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
30
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
Army
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico State
21
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · UAB
115 primary output · 71.7 efficiency · 7.4 usage
61.7
#2
2024 Regular Season · Florida International
52.1
90 primary · 63.3 efficiency · 7.2 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · East Carolina
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8337
Apopka · Apopka, FL
Career Facts
3
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
205
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 11 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Antonio Ferguson quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit