Usage Score
15.5
Player Dossier
2023-2025Louisiana Tech
Evan Bullock
QB • 6'5" • 220 lbs • Anna, TX, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Evan Bullock is a balanced quarterback profile with 11 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
56.4
Consistency
77.9
Season Value
62.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
23242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Louisiana Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Evan Bullock, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Louisiana Tech. Evan Bullock is a balanced quarterback profile with 11 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Louisiana Tech paired 1,981 primary output with 56.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 56.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with 279 yards of offense and 67.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
180.1
Efficiency
56.4
Usage
15.5
Consistency
77.9
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 159. Tulsa: 40. Florida International: 221. Middle Tennessee: 279. New Mexico State: 200. UTEP: 233. Sam Houston: 134. Jacksonville State: 251. Western Kentucky: 74. Arkansas: 176. Kennesaw State: 214
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 31 by 46.5. Tulsa: 7 by 58.7. Florida International: 42 by 56.3. Middle Tennessee: 32 by 67.2. New Mexico State: 48 by 50.3. UTEP: 36 by 60.6. Sam Houston: 34 by 49.3. Jacksonville State: 28 by 63.6. Western Kentucky: 20 by 58.2. Arkansas: 51 by 49.3. Kennesaw State: 36 by 60.1
Split Comparison
Wins200 · n=4 · +31.3 vs Losses
Losses168.7 · n=7 · -31.3 vs Wins
First Half188.7 · n=6 · +18.9 vs Second Half
Second Half169.8 · n=5 · -18.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
67.2 vs Middle Tennessee
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/29 | @ Army | L 6-27 | 14 | 28 | 169 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 46.5 | 3 | -10 | -3.30 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Kennesaw State | W 33-0 | 23 | 30 | 230 | 76.7 | 0 | 0 | 60.1 | 6 | -16 | -2.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Arkansas | L 14-35 | 26 | 43 | 190 | 60.5 | 2 | 0 | 49.3 | 8 | -14 | -1.80 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Western Kentucky | W 12-7 | 12 | 15 | 66 | 80.0 | 0 | 0 | 58.2 | 5 | 8 | 1.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Jacksonville State3+ TD | L 37-44 | 16 | 22 | 266 | 72.7 | 3 | 1 | 63.6 | 6 | -15 | -2.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Wed 10/30 | @ Sam Houston | L 3-9 | 16 | 25 | 148 | 64.0 | 0 | 1 | 49.3 | 9 | -14 | -1.60 | 0 | 8 |
| Wed 10/23 | vs UTEP | W 14-10 | 22 | 30 | 248 | 73.3 | 1 | 0 | 60.6 | 6 | -15 | -2.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Wed 10/16 | @ New Mexico State | L 30-33 | 22 | 41 | 233 | 53.7 | 2 | 0 | 50.3 | 7 | -33 | -4.70 | 0 | 0 |
| Fri 10/11 | vs Middle Tennessee3+ TD | W 48-21 | 18 | 25 | 290 | 72.0 | 5 | 0 | 67.2 | 7 | -11 | -1.60 | 1 | 3 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Florida International | L 10-17 | 26 | 37 | 218 | 70.3 | 0 | 0 | 56.3 | 5 | 3 | 0.60 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Tulsa | L 20-23 | 4 | 6 | 49 | 66.7 | 1 | 0 | 58.7 | 1 | -9 | -9 | 0 | 0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisiana Tech
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 20 | 23.8 | 4 | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 1,981 | 56.4 | 15.5 | 1,961 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 1,981 | 56.4 | 15.5 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 238 | 46 | 11 | -1,743 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Middle Tennessee
Win with 279 yards of offense and 67.2 efficiency.
279
Primary metric
279 total offense with 67.2 efficiency.
#2
Jacksonville State
251
Primary metric
Loss with 251 yards of offense and 63.6 efficiency.
251 total offense with 63.6 efficiency.
#3
Kennesaw State
113
Primary metric
Loss with 113 yards of offense and 44.8 efficiency.
113 total offense with 44.8 efficiency.
#4
UTEP
233
Primary metric
Win with 233 yards of offense and 60.6 efficiency.
233 total offense with 60.6 efficiency.
#5
Florida International
221
Primary metric
Loss with 221 yards of offense and 56.3 efficiency.
221 total offense with 56.3 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
1,981 primary output · 56.4 efficiency · 15.5 usage
62.4
#2
2024 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
62.4
1,981 primary · 56.4 efficiency · 15.5 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
32.2
20 primary · 23.8 efficiency · 4 usage
Milestones
2
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
4
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8344
Anna · Anna, TX
- Committed To
- Louisiana Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,239
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 16 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.