Usage Score
7.3
Player Profile
Alexander Kilgore
LB • 6'1" • 230 lbs • Katy, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Alexander Kilgore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
29.5
Consistency
51.5
Season Value
25.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · SMU
232324242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- SMU
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · SMU
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Alexander Kilgore, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · SMU. Alexander Kilgore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
SMU paired 7.5 primary output with 29.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 29.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · SMU
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
29.5
Usage
7.3
Consistency
51.5
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 1. Unknown: 1. TCU: 0. Syracuse: 1. Stanford: 0. Clemson: 1. Wake Forest: 2. Miami: 0. Boston College: 0. Louisville: 0. California: 1.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 3 by 22.5. Unknown: 0 by 10. TCU: 4 by 16.7. Syracuse: 2 by 18.3. Stanford: 5 by 20.8. Clemson: 11 by 55.8. Wake Forest: 7 by 49.2. Miami: 6 by 25. Boston College: 10 by 41.7. Louisville: 3 by 12.5. California: 9 by 52.5
Split Comparison
Wins0.4 · n=7 · -0.7 vs Losses
Losses1.2 · n=3 · +0.7 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · n=6 · -0.0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.7 · n=5 · +0.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
55.8 vs Clemson
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | vs Arizona | W 24-19 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/30 | @ California | L 35-38 | 9 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Louisville | W 38-6 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Boston College10+ tackles | W 45-13 | 10 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Miami | W 26-20 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Wake Forest | L 12-13 | 7 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Clemson10+ tackles | W 35-24 | 11 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Stanford | W 34-10 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Syracuse | W 31-18 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ TCU | L 24-35 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | SMU | 11.5 | 19.1 | 5.9 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | SMU | 11.5 | 19.1 | 5.9 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | SMU | 7 | 23 | 4.1 | -4.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | SMU | 7 | 23 | 4.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | SMU | 7.5 | 29.5 | 7.3 | 0.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | SMU | 7.5 | 29.5 | 7.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisiana Tech
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.6 takeover score.
#2
Wake Forest
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.4 takeover score.
#3
California
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 49.3 takeover score.
#4
Virginia
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.
#5
Pittsburgh
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 44.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · SMU
7.5 primary output · 29.5 efficiency · 7.3 usage
25.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · SMU
25.2
7.5 primary · 29.5 efficiency · 7.3 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · SMU
19.6
11.5 primary · 19.1 efficiency · 5.9 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
147
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 37 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.