Usage Score
6.5
Player Dossier
2023-2025Indiana
Broc Lowry
QB • 6'1" • 210 lbs • Canfield, OH, USA
Dual-threat creatorVolume operator
Broc Lowry is a dual-threat creator with 32.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
39.2
Consistency
29.2
Season Value
20.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Western Michigan
2324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Indiana • Western Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Broc Lowry, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Western Michigan. Broc Lowry is a dual-threat creator with 32.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Western Michigan paired 2,766 primary output with 65.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 39.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Indiana, Western Michigan.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Western Michigan
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
13.6
Efficiency
39.2
Usage
6.5
Consistency
29.2
Best Game by takeover score
South Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 6. Wisconsin: 2. Ohio State: 16. Unknown: 23. Akron: 7. Buffalo: 0. Kent State: 70. Northern Illinois: 1. Bowling Green: 4. Central Michigan: 8. Eastern Michigan: 13
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 2 by 30. Wisconsin: 1 by 20. Ohio State: 6 by 35. Unknown: 2 by 100. Akron: 5 by 14. Buffalo: 2 by 0. Kent State: 6 by 75.7. Northern Illinois: 1 by 10. Bowling Green: 1 by 40. Central Michigan: 3 by 63. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 43.3
Split Comparison
Wins22.5 · n=4 · +16.3 vs Losses
Losses6.2 · n=6 · -16.3 vs Wins
First Half9 · n=6 · -10.2 vs Second Half
Second Half19.2 · n=5 · +10.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/15 | vs South Alabama | L 23-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 26-18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 43.3 | 3 | 13 | 4.30 | 0 | 5 |
| Wed 11/20 | @ Central Michigan | L 14-16 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/13 | @ Bowling Green | L 13-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Thu 11/7 | vs Northern Illinois | L 28-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Kent StateDual-threat | W 52-21 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 75.7 | 3 | 57 | 19 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Buffalo | W 48-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Akron | W 34-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 | 5 | 7 | 1.40 | 1 | 5 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100 | 2 | 23 | 11.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Ohio State | L 0-56 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 4 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Wisconsin | L 14-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Indiana
2023
Opening stop
- 2
Western Michigan
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Indiana | 8 | 88.9 | 0 | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Western Michigan | 150 | 39.2 | 6.5 | 142 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 150 | 39.2 | 6.5 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Western Michigan | 2,766 | 65.9 | 32.9 | 2,616 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 2,766 | 65.9 | 32.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Maryland
Loss with 8 yards of offense and 88.9 efficiency.
8
Primary metric
8 total offense with 88.9 efficiency.
#2
Ball State
349
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
349 total offense with 85.7 efficiency.
#3
Miami (OH)
254
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
254 total offense with 62.3 efficiency.
#4
Kent State
70
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
70 total offense with 75.7 efficiency.
#5
Massachusetts
255
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
255 total offense with 71.9 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Western Michigan
2,766 primary output · 65.9 efficiency · 32.9 usage
68.8
#2
2025 Regular Season · Western Michigan
68.8
2,766 primary · 65.9 efficiency · 32.9 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Indiana
47.3
8 primary · 88.9 efficiency · 0 usage
Milestones
4
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
2
3+ takeover TD games
15
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.86
Canfield · Canfield, OH
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,924
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.