Usage Score
10.6
Player Dossier
2010-2013North Texas
Drew Miller
TE • 6'1" • Prosper, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Drew Miller reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.4
Consistency
49.5
Season Value
57.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · North Texas
1011121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- North Texas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Drew Miller, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · North Texas. Drew Miller reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
North Texas paired 105 primary output with 90.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · North Texas
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
21.2
Efficiency
70.4
Usage
10.6
Consistency
49.5
Best Game by takeover score
UNLV
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 16. Ball State: 10. Georgia: 26. Tulane: 16. Louisiana Tech: 10. Southern Miss: 43. UTEP: 44. UTSA: 10. Tulsa: 16
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 2 by 53.3. Ball State: 2 by 33.3. Georgia: 1 by 100. Tulane: 1 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 66.7. Southern Miss: 3 by 95.6. UTEP: 3 by 97.8. UTSA: 2 by 33.3. Tulsa: 2 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins23.2 · n=6 · +5.8 vs Losses
Losses17.3 · n=3 · -5.8 vs Wins
First Half15.6 · n=5 · -12.7 vs Second Half
Second Half28.3 · n=4 · +12.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulane
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs UNLV | W 36-14 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Tulsa | W 42-10 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs UTSA | L 13-21 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs UTEP | W 41-7 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Southern Miss | W 55-14 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 28-13 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Tulane | L 21-24 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Georgia | L 21-45 | — | 1 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Ball State | W 34-27 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
North Texas
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | North Texas | 31 | 100 | 5.9 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | North Texas | 105 | 90.4 | 12.6 | 74 |
| 2012 Regular Season | North Texas | 131 | 44.6 | 12.7 | 26 |
| 2013 Postseason | North Texas | 191 | 70.4 | 10.6 | 60 |
| 2013 Regular Season | North Texas | 191 | 70.4 | 10.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44
Primary metric
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana
50
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Southern Miss
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#4
Troy
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · North Texas
105 primary output · 90.4 efficiency · 12.6 usage
58.7
#2
2013 Postseason · North Texas
57.6
191 primary · 70.4 efficiency · 10.6 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · North Texas
57.6
191 primary · 70.4 efficiency · 10.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
458
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.