Usage Score
5.5
Player Dossier
2010-2012Louisiana Tech
David Gru
WR • 6'0" • Newbury Park, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
David Gru reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.3
Consistency
44.2
Season Value
46
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
10111112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Louisiana Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Gru, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Louisiana Tech. David Gru reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Louisiana Tech paired 339 primary output with 69.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
20
Efficiency
74.3
Usage
5.5
Consistency
44.2
Best Game by takeover score
San José State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 42. Rice: 15. UNLV: 33. Texas A&M: 24. Idaho: 9. New Mexico State: 8. UTSA: 0. Texas State: 10. Utah State: 47. San José State: 12
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 2 by 100. Rice: 1 by 100. UNLV: 2 by 100. Texas A&M: 1 by 100. Idaho: 2 by 30. New Mexico State: 1 by 53.3. Texas State: 1 by 66.7. Utah State: 4 by 78.3. San José State: 2 by 40
Split Comparison
Wins16.7 · n=7 · -11.0 vs Losses
Losses27.7 · n=3 · +11.0 vs Wins
First Half24.6 · n=5 · +9.2 vs Second Half
Second Half15.4 · n=5 · -9.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas A&M
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/25 | @ San José State | L 43-52 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Utah State | L 41-48 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/11 | @ Texas State | W 62-55 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs UTSA | W 51-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/28 | @ New Mexico State | W 28-14 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Idaho | W 70-28 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 10/14 | vs Texas A&M | L 57-59 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs UNLV | W 58-31 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Rice | W 56-37 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 9/9 | @ Houston | W 56-49 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 24 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisiana Tech
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2010201120112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 122 | 78.2 | 9.8 | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 339 | 69.5 | 10.9 | 217 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 339 | 69.5 | 10.9 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 200 | 74.3 | 5.5 | -139 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Fresno State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72
Primary metric
72 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Idaho
40
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Utah State
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Utah State
47
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 78.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
339 primary output · 69.5 efficiency · 10.9 usage
60.2
#2
2011 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
60.2
339 primary · 69.5 efficiency · 10.9 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
49.7
122 primary · 78.2 efficiency · 9.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
661
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.