Usage Score
16.5
Player Dossier
2010-2014Western Kentucky
WR • 5'10" • Bradenton, FL, USA
Willie McNeal reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
16.5
Efficiency
65.3
Consistency
53.9
Season Value
58.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Willie McNeal, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Western Kentucky. Willie McNeal reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Western Kentucky paired 599 primary output with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 65.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
55.5
Efficiency
65.3
Usage
16.5
Consistency
53.9
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 155. Bowling Green: 70. Illinois: 39. Middle Tennessee: 31. Navy: 42. UAB: 49. Florida Atlantic: 56. Louisiana Tech: -3. UTEP: 41. Army: 57. UTSA: 105. Marshall: 24
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 5 by 100. Bowling Green: 5 by 93.3. Illinois: 4 by 65. Middle Tennessee: 6 by 34.4. Navy: 5 by 56. UAB: 5 by 65.3. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 74.7. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 0. UTEP: 5 by 54.7. Army: 3 by 100. UTSA: 7 by 100. Marshall: 4 by 40
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Central Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/24 | vs Central Michigan100 receiving yards | W 49-48 | — | 5 | 155 | 31 | 31 | 1 | 56 |
| Fri 11/28 | @ Marshall | W 67-66 | — | 4 | 24 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs UTSA100 receiving yards | W 45-7 | — | 7 | 105 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 67 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Army | W 52-24 | — | 3 | 57 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs UTEP | W 35-27 | — | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 10-59 | — | 2 | -3 | -1.5 | -1.50 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 38-45 | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs UAB | L 39-42 | — | 5 | 49 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Navy | W 36-27 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 47-50 | — | 6 | 31 | 5.2 | 5.20 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Illinois | L 34-42 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Bowling Green2+ TD | W 59-31 | — | 5 | 70 | 14 | 14 | 2 | 29 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Western Kentucky
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 360 | 79 | 19.9 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 0 | — | — | -360 |
| 2012 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 556 | 70.7 | 21.6 | 556 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 556 | 70.7 | 21.6 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 599 | 76.7 | 18.2 | 43 |
| 2014 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 666 | 65.3 | 16.5 | 67 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 666 | 65.3 | 16.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Army
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101
Primary metric
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Middle Tennessee
119
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
120
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
155
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
599 primary output · 76.7 efficiency · 18.2 usage
65.8
#2
2014 Postseason · Western Kentucky
58.9
666 primary · 65.3 efficiency · 16.5 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
58.9
666 primary · 65.3 efficiency · 16.5 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,181
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Willie McNeal quick answers