Usage Score
28.7
Player Dossier
2010-2013Toledo
Bernard Reedy
WR • 5'9" • St. Petersburg, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Bernard Reedy reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.4
Consistency
65.5
Season Value
62.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Toledo
101111121213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bernard Reedy, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Toledo. Bernard Reedy reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Toledo paired 1,105 primary output with 72.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 78.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Toledo
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
70
Efficiency
78.4
Usage
28.7
Consistency
65.5
Best Game by takeover score
Akron
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 50. Missouri: 33. Unknown: 112. Central Michigan: 96. Ball State: 37. Western Michigan: 85. Navy: 30. Bowling Green: 60. Eastern Michigan: 84. Buffalo: 149. Northern Illinois: 63. Akron: 41
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 7 by 47.6. Missouri: 6 by 36.7. Unknown: 5 by 100. Central Michigan: 8 by 80. Ball State: 13 by 19. Western Michigan: 4 by 100. Navy: 3 by 66.7. Bowling Green: 3 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 100. Buffalo: 3 by 100. Northern Illinois: 4 by 100. Akron: 3 by 91.1
Split Comparison
Wins84 · n=6 · +39.2 vs Losses
Losses44.8 · n=5 · -39.2 vs Wins
First Half68.8 · n=6 · -2.3 vs Second Half
Second Half71.2 · n=6 · +2.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | @ Akron | L 29-31 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 1 | 28 |
| Thu 11/21 | vs Northern Illinois | L 17-35 | — | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 1 | 36 |
| Wed 11/13 | vs Buffalo100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 51-41 | — | 3 | 149 | 49.7 | 49.70 | 2 | 59 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 55-16 | — | 3 | 84 | 21.3 | 28 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Bowling Green | W 28-25 | — | 3 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Navy | W 45-44 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Western Michigan | W 47-20 | — | 4 | 85 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Ball StateHigh volume | L 24-31 | — | 13 | 37 | 2.8 | 2.80 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Central MichiganHigh volume | W 38-17 | — | 8 | 96 | 10.6 | 12 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 5 | 112 | 15.9 | 22.40 | 1 | 81 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Missouri | L 23-38 | — | 6 | 33 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Florida | L 6-24 | — | 7 | 50 | 7.1 | 7.10 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
201020112011201220122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Toledo | 32 | 34.2 | 7.8 | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Toledo | 716 | 86.7 | 15.1 | 684 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Toledo | 716 | 86.7 | 15.1 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Toledo | 1,105 | 72.9 | 33.8 | 389 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Toledo | 1,105 | 72.9 | 33.8 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Toledo | 840 | 78.4 | 28.7 | -265 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
237
Primary metric
237 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Bowling Green
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
149
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
149 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Air Force
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
113
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Toledo
1,105 primary output · 72.9 efficiency · 33.8 usage
66
#2
2012 Regular Season · Toledo
66
1,105 primary · 72.9 efficiency · 33.8 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Toledo
62.9
840 primary · 78.4 efficiency · 28.7 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,693
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.