Usage Score
25.6
Player Dossier
2010-2013Ohio
Donte Foster
WR • 6'1" • Guthrie, OK, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Donte Foster reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.8
Consistency
66.7
Season Value
68.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Ohio
1010111112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Ohio
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Donte Foster, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Ohio. Donte Foster reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Ohio paired 1,018 primary output with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Ohio
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
78.3
Efficiency
80.8
Usage
25.6
Consistency
66.7
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. East Carolina: 160. Louisville: 56. North Texas: 59. Marshall: 80. Unknown: 64. Akron: 76. Central Michigan: 118. Eastern Michigan: 143. Miami (OH): 122. Buffalo: 10. Bowling Green: 6. Kent State: 35. Massachusetts: 89
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. East Carolina: 6 by 100. Louisville: 2 by 100. North Texas: 6 by 65.6. Marshall: 8 by 66.7. Unknown: 2 by 100. Akron: 4 by 100. Central Michigan: 9 by 87.4. Eastern Michigan: 11 by 86.7. Miami (OH): 8 by 100. Buffalo: 1 by 66.7. Bowling Green: 2 by 20. Kent State: 4 by 58.3. Massachusetts: 6 by 98.9
Split Comparison
Wins94.8 · n=6 · +30.7 vs Losses
Losses64.2 · n=6 · -30.7 vs Wins
First Half87.6 · n=7 · +20.1 vs Second Half
Second Half67.5 · n=6 · -20.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
East Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs East Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/23 | @ East Carolina100 receiving yards | L 20-37 | — | 6 | 160 | 26.7 | 26.70 | 1 | 80 |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Massachusetts | W 51-23 | — | 6 | 89 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 25 |
| Wed 11/20 | vs Kent State | L 13-44 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Wed 11/13 | @ Bowling Green | L 0-49 | — | 2 | 6 | 3.7 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Wed 11/6 | @ Buffalo | L 3-30 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-16 | — | 8 | 122 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 3 | 33 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | W 56-28 | — | 11 | 143 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Central Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | L 23-26 | — | 9 | 118 | 13.1 | 13.10 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Akron | W 43-3 | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 64 | 32 | 32 | 1 | 53 |
| Sun 9/15 | vs MarshallHigh volume | W 34-31 | — | 8 | 80 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs North Texas | W 27-21 | — | 6 | 59 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/1 | @ Louisville | L 7-49 | — | 2 | 56 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 47 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102010201120112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Ohio | 151 | 79 | 12.8 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio | 151 | 79 | 12.8 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Ohio | 352 | 70.8 | 13.9 | 201 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio | 352 | 70.8 | 13.9 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Ohio | 659 | 66.6 | 25.6 | 307 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio | 659 | 66.6 | 25.6 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Ohio | 1,018 | 80.8 | 25.6 | 359 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio | 1,018 | 80.8 | 25.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
164
Primary metric
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
East Carolina
160
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
160 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Eastern Michigan
143
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
143 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Miami (OH)
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Miami (OH)
122
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Ohio
1,018 primary output · 80.8 efficiency · 25.6 usage
68.3
#2
2013 Regular Season · Ohio
68.3
1,018 primary · 80.8 efficiency · 25.6 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Ohio
54.9
659 primary · 66.6 efficiency · 25.6 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,180
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.