Usage / Role
34%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2010-2014Kent State
TE • 6'4" • Parma, OH, USA
Casey Pierce reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
34%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
72
High-end production for a tight end
Reliability
60
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
78
High-upside career profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2014 Regular Season · Kent State
Snapshot
Player Story
Casey Pierce built his college career from 2010 through 2014 as a tight end from Parma, OH wearing No. 7, spending time with Kent State. The clearest part of Casey Pierce's career was his receiving role: 97 catches,...
Read the storyCasey Pierce, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Regular Season · Kent State. Casey Pierce reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Regular Season | Kent State | 3 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 39.2 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Kent State | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 50.4 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Kent State | 11 | 33 | 364 | 5 | 61.7 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Kent State | 11 | 60 | 641 | 6 | 81 |
Related Context
Casey Pierce played TE for Kent State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Casey Pierce recorded 1,040 receiving yards and 11 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Kent State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Kent State paired 641 primary output with 68.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 68.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2014 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
58.3
Efficiency
68.6
Usage
24.6
Consistency
73.4
Best Game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 26. South Alabama: 80. Ohio State: 22. Virginia: 52. Northern Illinois: 22. Massachusetts: 57. Army: 55. Miami (OH): 62. Toledo: 57. Bowling Green: 127. Akron: 81
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 4 by 43.3. South Alabama: 4 by 100. Ohio State: 3 by 48.9. Virginia: 3 by 100. Northern Illinois: 3 by 48.9. Massachusetts: 6 by 63.3. Army: 5 by 73.3. Miami (OH): 6 by 68.9. Toledo: 8 by 47.5. Bowling Green: 12 by 70.6. Akron: 6 by 90
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | vs Akron | W 27-24 | — | 6 | 81 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Thu 11/13 | @ Bowling Green100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-30 | — | 12 | 127 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 1 | 29 |
| Wed 11/5 | vs ToledoHigh volume | L 20-30 | — | 8 | 57 | 7.1 | 7.10 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Miami (OH) | L 3-10 | — | 6 | 62 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Army2+ TD | W 39-17 | — | 5 | 55 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 30 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Massachusetts | L 17-40 | — | 6 | 57 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Northern Illinois | L 14-17 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Virginia | L 13-45 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Ohio State | L 0-66 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs South Alabama | L 13-23 | — | 4 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Ohio | L 14-17 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 10 |
Player Story
Casey Pierce built his college career from 2010 through 2014 as a tight end from Parma, OH wearing No. 7, spending time with Kent State. The clearest part of Casey Pierce's career was his receiving role: 97 catches, 1,040 receiving yards, and 11 touchdowns across 26 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2014 with Kent State. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. With 26 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Kent State.
The arc is straightforward: Casey Pierce moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Kent State
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Kent State | 25 | 55.6 | 7.2 | 25 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Kent State | 10 | 66.7 | 10 | -15 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Kent State | 364 | 67.6 | 17.4 | 354 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Kent State | 641 | 68.6 | 24.6 | 277 |
#1 Featured game
vs Buffalo
Week 9 · L 21-41 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71
Receiving Yards
92.7 takeover
71 receiving yards with a 94.7 efficiency score.
#2
@ Bowling Green
Week 12 · L 20-30 · Conference game
127
Receiving Yards
90.2 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 70.6 efficiency score.
#3
@ Akron
Week 10 · L 7-16 · Conference game
57
Receiving Yards
85.4 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 76 efficiency score.
#4
vs South Alabama
Week 2 · L 13-23
80
Receiving Yards
80.4 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs Akron
Week 14 · W 27-24 · Conference game
81
Receiving Yards
75 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2014 Regular Season · Kent State
641 primary output · 68.6 efficiency · 24.6 usage
81
#2
2013 Regular Season · Kent State
61.7
364 primary · 67.6 efficiency · 17.4 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Kent State
50.4
10 primary · 66.7 efficiency · 10 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.