Usage Score
24.6
Player Dossier
2010-2014Kent State
Casey Pierce
TE • 6'4" • Parma, OH, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Casey Pierce reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.6
Consistency
73.4
Season Value
66.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Kent State
1011121314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Kent State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Casey Pierce, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Kent State. Casey Pierce reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Kent State paired 641 primary output with 68.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 68.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2014 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · Kent State
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
58.3
Efficiency
68.6
Usage
24.6
Consistency
73.4
Best Game by takeover score
Akron
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 26. South Alabama: 80. Ohio State: 22. Virginia: 52. Northern Illinois: 22. Massachusetts: 57. Army: 55. Miami (OH): 62. Toledo: 57. Bowling Green: 127. Akron: 81
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 4 by 43.3. South Alabama: 4 by 100. Ohio State: 3 by 48.9. Virginia: 3 by 100. Northern Illinois: 3 by 48.9. Massachusetts: 6 by 63.3. Army: 5 by 73.3. Miami (OH): 6 by 68.9. Toledo: 8 by 47.5. Bowling Green: 12 by 70.6. Akron: 6 by 90
Split Comparison
Wins68 · n=2 · +11.9 vs Losses
Losses56.1 · n=9 · -11.9 vs Wins
First Half43.2 · n=6 · -33.2 vs Second Half
Second Half76.4 · n=5 · +33.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | vs Akron | W 27-24 | — | 6 | 81 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Thu 11/13 | @ Bowling Green100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-30 | — | 12 | 127 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 1 | 29 |
| Wed 11/5 | vs ToledoHigh volume | L 20-30 | — | 8 | 57 | 7.1 | 7.10 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Miami (OH) | L 3-10 | — | 6 | 62 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Army2+ TD | W 39-17 | — | 5 | 55 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 30 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Massachusetts | L 17-40 | — | 6 | 57 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Northern Illinois | L 14-17 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Virginia | L 13-45 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Ohio State | L 0-66 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs South Alabama | L 13-23 | — | 4 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Ohio | L 14-17 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kent State
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011201220132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Kent State | 25 | 55.6 | 7.2 | 25 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Kent State | 10 | 66.7 | 10 | -15 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Kent State | 364 | 67.6 | 17.4 | 354 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Kent State | 641 | 68.6 | 24.6 | 277 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71
Primary metric
71 receiving yards with a 94.7 efficiency score.
#2
Bowling Green
127
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 70.6 efficiency score.
#3
Akron
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 76 efficiency score.
#4
South Alabama
80
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
12
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Kent State
641 primary output · 68.6 efficiency · 24.6 usage
66.4
#2
2013 Regular Season · Kent State
51.4
364 primary · 67.6 efficiency · 17.4 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Kent State
44.6
10 primary · 66.7 efficiency · 10 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,040
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.