Usage / Role
15%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2010-2013Rutgers
WR • 6'6" • Accokeek, MD, USA
Brandon Coleman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
15%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
77
High-end production for a receiver
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
62
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Rutgers
Snapshot
Player Story
Brandon Coleman built his college career from 2010 through 2013 as a wide receiver from Accokeek, MD wearing No. 17, spending time with Rutgers. The clearest part of Brandon Coleman's career was his receiving role:...
Read the storyBrandon Coleman, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Rutgers. Brandon Coleman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Postseason | Rutgers | 9 | 1 | 86 | 1 | 58.9 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rutgers | 9 | 16 | 466 | 5 | 58.9 |
| 2012 Postseason | Rutgers | 13 | 4 | 55 | 0 | 81.3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rutgers | 13 | 39 | 663 | 10 | 81.3 |
| 2013 Postseason | Rutgers | 12 | 2 | 65 | 1 | 70.3 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rutgers | 12 | 32 | 473 | 3 | 70.3 |
Related Context
Brandon Coleman played WR for Rutgers. Across 4 tracked seasons, Brandon Coleman recorded 1,808 receiving yards and 20 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Rutgers.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Rutgers paired 718 primary output with 89.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 94.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
44.8
Efficiency
94.7
Usage
14.8
Consistency
62.3
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 65. Fresno State: 94. Norfolk State: 30. Eastern Michigan: 15. Arkansas: 25. SMU: 56. Louisville: 66. Temple: 40. Cincinnati: 77. UCF: 20. UConn: 36. South Florida: 14
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 2 by 100. Fresno State: 9 by 69.6. Norfolk State: 2 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 100. Arkansas: 1 by 100. SMU: 2 by 100. Louisville: 5 by 88. Temple: 2 by 100. Cincinnati: 6 by 85.6. UCF: 1 by 100. UConn: 2 by 100. South Florida: 1 by 93.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Fresno State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ Notre Dame | L 16-29 | — | 2 | 65 | 32.5 | 32.50 | 1 | 51 |
| Sun 12/8 | vs South Florida | W 31-6 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ UConn | L 17-28 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 19 |
| Fri 11/22 | @ UCF | L 17-41 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Cincinnati | L 17-52 | — | 6 | 77 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Temple | W 23-20 | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 30 |
| Thu 10/10 | @ Louisville | L 10-24 | — | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ SMU | W 55-52 | — | 2 | 56 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 56 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Arkansas | W 28-24 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 28-10 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Norfolk State | W 38-0 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 26 |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Fresno StateHigh volume · 2+ TD | L 51-52 | — | 9 | 94 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 2 | 28 |
Player Story
Brandon Coleman built his college career from 2010 through 2013 as a wide receiver from Accokeek, MD wearing No. 17, spending time with Rutgers. The clearest part of Brandon Coleman's career was his receiving role: 94 catches, 1,808 receiving yards, and 20 touchdowns across 34 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2012 with Rutgers. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. With 34 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Rutgers.
The arc is straightforward: Brandon Coleman moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rutgers
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Rutgers | 552 | 95.6 | 9.4 | 552 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rutgers | 552 | 95.6 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Rutgers | 718 | 89.6 | 19.6 | 166 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rutgers | 718 | 89.6 | 19.6 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Rutgers | 538 | 94.7 | 14.8 | -180 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rutgers | 538 | 94.7 | 14.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Syracuse
Week 7 · W 23-15 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ UConn
Week 13 · L 22-40 · Conference game
223
Receiving Yards
97 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
223 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
@ Fresno State
Week 1 · L 51-52
94
Receiving Yards
89.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 69.6 efficiency score.
#4
@ Arkansas
Week 4 · W 35-26
89
Receiving Yards
88.2 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 98.9 efficiency score.
#5
vs Louisville
Week 14 · L 17-20 · Conference game
100
Receiving Yards
82.5 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Postseason · Rutgers
718 primary output · 89.6 efficiency · 19.6 usage
81.3
#2
2012 Regular Season · Rutgers
81.3
718 primary · 89.6 efficiency · 19.6 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Rutgers
70.3
538 primary · 94.7 efficiency · 14.8 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.