Usage Score
7.4
Player Dossier
2010-2014Buffalo
John Dunmore
WR • 6'0" • Syracuse, NY, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
John Dunmore reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
47.8
Consistency
40.3
Season Value
31.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Buffalo
1011121314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
John Dunmore, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Buffalo. John Dunmore reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 106 primary output with 72.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 47.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · Buffalo
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
10.7
Efficiency
47.8
Usage
7.4
Consistency
40.3
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 5. Baylor: 21. Ohio: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 1 by 33.3. Baylor: 2 by 70. Ohio: 1 by 40
Split Comparison
Losses10.7 · n=3
First Half13 · n=2
All Games10.7 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Baylor
Best efficiency game
70 vs Baylor
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011201220132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Buffalo | 106 | 72.1 | 20.8 | 106 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Buffalo | 30 | 66.6 | 5.9 | -76 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Buffalo | 32 | 47.8 | 7.4 | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
72
Primary metric
72 receiving yards with a 68.6 efficiency score.
#2
Massachusetts
14
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Baylor
21
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 70 efficiency score.
#4
Northern Illinois
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 75.6 efficiency score.
#5
Eastern Michigan
8
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Buffalo
106 primary output · 72.1 efficiency · 20.8 usage
65.8
#2
2013 Regular Season · Buffalo
46.1
30 primary · 66.6 efficiency · 5.9 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Buffalo
31.4
32 primary · 47.8 efficiency · 7.4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
168
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.