Usage / Role
3%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2010-2012Ball State
TE • 6'2" • Cincinnati, OH, USA
David Schneider reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
3%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
23
Developing production for a tight end
Reliability
19
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
32
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Ball State
Snapshot
David Schneider, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Ball State. David Schneider reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Ball State | 4 | 5 | 73 | 1 | 70.3 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ball State | 4 | 4 | 70 | 1 | 50.3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ball State | 4 | 5 | 23 | 0 | 37.2 |
Related Context
David Schneider played TE for Ball State. Across 3 tracked seasons, David Schneider recorded 166 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Ball State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Ball State paired 73 primary output with 88.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 88.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
18.3
Efficiency
88.3
Usage
8.3
Consistency
65.2
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Southeast Missouri State: 9. Toledo: 14. Akron: 19. Buffalo: 31
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southeast Missouri State: 1 by 60. Toledo: 1 by 93.3. Akron: 1 by 100. Buffalo: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ball State
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Ball State | 73 | 88.3 | 8.3 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ball State | 70 | 53.3 | 4.9 | -3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ball State | 23 | 32.5 | 5 | -47 |
#1 Featured game
@ Buffalo
Week 11 · W 20-3 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31
Receiving Yards
79 takeover
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Army
Week 4 · W 48-21
51
Receiving Yards
70.9 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs Akron
Week 10 · W 37-30 · Conference game
19
Receiving Yards
61.2 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
vs Northern Illinois
Week 6 · L 23-35 · Conference game
9
Receiving Yards
56 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
@ Toledo
Week 8 · L 24-31 · Conference game
14
Receiving Yards
52.1 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Regular Season · Ball State
73 primary output · 88.3 efficiency · 8.3 usage
70.3
#2
2011 Regular Season · Ball State
50.3
70 primary · 53.3 efficiency · 4.9 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Ball State
37.2
23 primary · 32.5 efficiency · 5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.