Usage / Role
5%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2010-2013Army
WR • 6'2" • Greenville, SC, USA
Anthony Stephens reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
5%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
12
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
7
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
21
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Army
Snapshot
Anthony Stephens, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Army. Anthony Stephens reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Army | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Regular Season | Army | 2 | 2 | 54 | 1 | 97.4 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Army | 1 | 2 | 46 | 1 | 94.8 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Army | 6 | 10 | 58 | 0 | 72.7 |
Related Context
Anthony Stephens played WR for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Anthony Stephens recorded 158 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Army paired 54 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 38.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
9.7
Efficiency
38.3
Usage
25.6
Consistency
67.2
Best Game by takeover score
Ball State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ball State: 21. Stanford: 10. Boston College: 9. Air Force: 12. Western Kentucky: 4. Hawai'i: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ball State: 3 by 46.7. Stanford: 2 by 33.3. Boston College: 2 by 30. Air Force: 1 by 80. Western Kentucky: 1 by 26.7. Hawai'i: 1 by 13.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
80 vs Air Force
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Army | 54 | 100 | 75 | 54 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Army | 46 | 100 | 66.7 | -8 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Army | 58 | 38.3 | 25.6 | 12 |
#1 Featured game
vs Fordham
Week 9 · W 55-0
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
30
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ Eastern Michigan
Week 8 · L 38-48
46
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs San Diego State
Week 2 · L 20-23
24
Receiving Yards
93.3 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
@ Ball State
Week 2 · L 14-40
21
Receiving Yards
82.2 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
vs Stanford
Week 3 · L 20-34
10
Receiving Yards
60.3 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Regular Season · Army
54 primary output · 100 efficiency · 75 usage
97.4
#2
2012 Regular Season · Army
94.8
46 primary · 100 efficiency · 66.7 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Army
72.7
58 primary · 38.3 efficiency · 25.6 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.