Usage Score
25.6
Player Dossier
2010-2013Army
WR • 6'2" • Greenville, SC, USA
Anthony Stephens reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25.6
Efficiency
38.3
Consistency
67.2
Season Value
57.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Army
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Stephens, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Army. Anthony Stephens reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Army paired 54 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 38.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
9.7
Efficiency
38.3
Usage
25.6
Consistency
67.2
Best Game by takeover score
Hawai'i
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ball State: 21. Stanford: 10. Boston College: 9. Air Force: 12. Western Kentucky: 4. Hawai'i: 2
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ball State: 3 by 46.7. Stanford: 2 by 33.3. Boston College: 2 by 30. Air Force: 1 by 80. Western Kentucky: 1 by 26.7. Hawai'i: 1 by 13.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
80 vs Air Force
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Army | 54 | 100 | 75 | 54 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Army | 46 | 100 | 66.7 | -8 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Army | 58 | 38.3 | 25.6 | 12 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
30
Primary metric
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
46
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
San Diego State
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Ball State
21
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
Air Force
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Army
54 primary output · 100 efficiency · 75 usage
90.7
#2
2012 Regular Season · Army
86.2
46 primary · 100 efficiency · 66.7 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Army
57.4
58 primary · 38.3 efficiency · 25.6 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
158
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 9 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Anthony Stephens quick answers