Usage Score
20
Player Dossier
2010-2013Rice
Jeremy Eddington
TE • 6'2" • Paris, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jeremy Eddington reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
100
Consistency
8.3
Season Value
34.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Rice
1011121213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Rice
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremy Eddington, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Rice. Jeremy Eddington reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Rice paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Rice
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
8.8
Efficiency
100
Usage
20
Consistency
8.3
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 0. UTSA: 0. North Texas: 0. UAB: 35
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Wins11.7 · n=3
First Half0 · n=2 · -17.5 vs Second Half
Second Half17.5 · n=2 · +17.5 vs First Half
All Games8.8 · n=4
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
100 vs UAB
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rice
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011201220122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rice | 34 | 38.5 | 6.8 | 34 |
| 2012 Postseason | Rice | 12 | 26.7 | 5.3 | -22 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rice | 12 | 26.7 | 5.3 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rice | 35 | 100 | 20 | 23 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35
Primary metric
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTEP
10
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 55.6 efficiency score.
#4
Tulsa
6
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#5
Houston
2
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
2 receiving yards with a 13.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Rice
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2013 Regular Season · Rice
34.3
35 primary · 100 efficiency · 20 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Rice
16
34 primary · 38.5 efficiency · 6.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
81
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.