Usage Score
30.9
Player Dossier
2010-2011Memphis
Tannar Rehrer
WR • 6'1" • Orem, UT, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Tannar Rehrer reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
59
Consistency
69.8
Season Value
64.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Memphis
1011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tannar Rehrer, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Memphis. Tannar Rehrer reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Memphis paired 593 primary output with 59 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 59 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Memphis
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
49.4
Efficiency
59
Usage
30.9
Consistency
69.8
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 17. Arkansas State: 24. Unknown: 54. SMU: 51. Middle Tennessee: 72. Rice: 89. East Carolina: 35. Tulane: 57. UCF: 21. UAB: 29. Marshall: 91. Southern Miss: 53
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 3 by 37.8. Arkansas State: 5 by 32. Unknown: 2 by 100. SMU: 5 by 68. Middle Tennessee: 10 by 48. Rice: 11 by 53.9. East Carolina: 5 by 46.7. Tulane: 5 by 76. UCF: 1 by 100. UAB: 7 by 27.6. Marshall: 9 by 67.4. Southern Miss: 7 by 50.5
Split Comparison
Losses48.2 · n=10
First Half51.2 · n=6 · +3.5 vs Second Half
Second Half47.7 · n=6 · -3.5 vs First Half
All Games49.4 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCF
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Southern Miss | L 7-44 | — | 7 | 53 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 0 | 13 |
| Fri 11/18 | vs MarshallHigh volume | L 22-23 | — | 9 | 91 | 10.1 | 10.10 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs UAB | L 35-41 | — | 7 | 29 | 4.1 | 4.10 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ UCF | L 0-41 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Tulane | W 33-17 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs East Carolina | L 17-35 | — | 5 | 35 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ RiceHigh volume | L 6-28 | — | 11 | 89 | 8.1 | 8.10 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Middle TennesseeHigh volume | L 31-38 | — | 10 | 72 | 7.2 | 7.20 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs SMU | L 0-42 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 54 | 27 | 27 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Arkansas State | L 3-47 | — | 5 | 24 | 4.8 | 4.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Mississippi State | L 14-59 | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Memphis
2010-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Memphis | 284 | 76 | 13.1 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Memphis | 593 | 59 | 30.9 | 309 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42
Primary metric
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Louisville
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
91
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 67.4 efficiency score.
#4
UCF
38
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Rice
89
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 53.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Memphis
593 primary output · 59 efficiency · 30.9 usage
64.7
#2
2010 Regular Season · Memphis
48.3
284 primary · 76 efficiency · 13.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
877
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.