Usage Score
13.8
Player Dossier
2010-2014Houston
Shane Ros
WR • 5'10" • Katy, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Shane Ros reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.8
Consistency
70.9
Season Value
66
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Houston
1011121314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shane Ros, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Houston. Shane Ros reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Houston paired 337 primary output with 83.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 83.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Houston
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
56.2
Efficiency
83.8
Usage
13.8
Consistency
70.9
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 61. UAB: 114. SMU: 24. UTEP: 24. East Carolina: 62. Marshall: 52
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 4 by 100. UAB: 7 by 100. SMU: 2 by 80. UTEP: 3 by 53.3. East Carolina: 2 by 100. Marshall: 5 by 69.3
Split Comparison
Wins66.3 · n=3 · +20.3 vs Losses
Losses46 · n=3 · -20.3 vs Wins
First Half66.3 · n=3 · +20.3 vs Second Half
Second Half46 · n=3 · -20.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
100 vs East Carolina
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011201220132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Houston | 337 | 83.8 | 13.8 | 337 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | -337 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
114
Primary metric
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
North Texas
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Marshall
52
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 69.3 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Houston
337 primary output · 83.8 efficiency · 13.8 usage
66
#2
2010 Regular Season · Houston
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Houston
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
337
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 6 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.