Usage Score
2.8
Player Dossier
2010-2011Kansas
Quinn Mecham
QB • 6'2" • Provo, UT, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Quinn Mecham is a balanced quarterback profile with 2.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
63.4
Consistency
49.8
Season Value
34
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Kansas
1011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Kansas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Quinn Mecham, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Kansas. Quinn Mecham is a balanced quarterback profile with 2.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Kansas paired 560 primary output with 35.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 63.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Loss with 63 yards of offense and 80.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Kansas
Games
4
Primary Metric / G
28.3
Efficiency
63.4
Usage
2.8
Consistency
49.8
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 63. Oklahoma State: 9. Kansas State: 41. Texas A&M: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 8 by 80.2. Oklahoma State: 1 by 91.7. Kansas State: 9 by 48.2. Texas A&M: 1 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Losses28.3 · n=4
First Half36 · n=2 · +15.5 vs Second Half
Second Half20.5 · n=2 · -15.5 vs First Half
All Games28.3 · n=4
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Best efficiency game
91.7 vs Oklahoma State
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kansas
2010-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Kansas | 560 | 35.9 | 14.8 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Kansas | 113 | 63.4 | 2.8 | -447 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Georgia Tech
Loss with 63 yards of offense and 80.2 efficiency.
63
Primary metric
63 total offense with 80.2 efficiency.
#2
Colorado
272
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
272 total offense with 65.5 efficiency.
#3
Oklahoma State
9
Primary metric
Loss with 9 yards of offense and 91.7 efficiency.
9 total offense with 91.7 efficiency.
#4
Oklahoma State
138
Primary metric
Loss with 138 yards of offense and 51.6 efficiency.
138 total offense with 51.6 efficiency.
#5
Kansas State
41
Primary metric
Loss with 41 yards of offense and 48.2 efficiency.
41 total offense with 48.2 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Kansas
560 primary output · 35.9 efficiency · 14.8 usage
48.4
#2
2011 Regular Season · Kansas
34
113 primary · 63.4 efficiency · 2.8 usage
Milestones
1
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
3
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
673
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.