Usage Score
19.6
Player Dossier
2010-2014BYU
Josh Quezada
RB • 5'11" • La Habra, CA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Josh Quezada leans balanced backfield option traits and 34.8 efficiency.
Efficiency
34.8
Consistency
37.3
Season Value
40.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Fresno State
101011111213131414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- BYU • Fresno State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nevada
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josh Quezada, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Fresno State. Josh Quezada leans balanced backfield option traits and 34.8 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Fresno State paired 1,097 primary output with 58.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 34.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across BYU, Fresno State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nevada
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · Fresno State
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
57.5
Efficiency
34.8
Usage
19.6
Consistency
37.3
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 58. Utah: 18. Nebraska: 23. Unknown: 105. New Mexico: 59. San Diego State: 25. UNLV: 17. Boise State: 4. Wyoming: 7. San José State: 145. Nevada: 177. Hawai'i: 33. Boise State: 77
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 14 by 44.3. Utah: 6 by 12.5. Nebraska: 11 by 26.2. Unknown: 15 by 72.9. New Mexico: 12 by 44.2. San Diego State: 8 by 27.6. UNLV: 5 by 20.4. Boise State: 5 by 5.4. Wyoming: 4 by 18.2. San José State: 27 by 51.5. Nevada: 31 by 54.8. Hawai'i: 8 by 43. Boise State: 21 by 31.1
Split Comparison
Wins87.8 · n=5 · +58.7 vs Losses
Losses29.1 · n=7 · -58.7 vs Wins
First Half43.6 · n=7 · -30.3 vs Second Half
Second Half73.8 · n=6 · +30.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Nevada
Best efficiency game
72.9 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/25 | @ Rice | L 6-30 | 12 | 52 | 4.30 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 4.1 |
| Sun 12/7 | @ Boise State | L 14-28 | 15 | 38 | 2.50 | 1 | 6 | 39 | 3.7 |
| Sun 11/30 | vs Hawai'i | W 28-21 | 8 | 33 | 4.10 | 1 | — | — | 4.1 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Nevada100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 40-20 | 24 | 119 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 58 | 5.7 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs San José State100 rush yards | W 38-24 | 24 | 112 | 4.70 | 0 | 3 | 33 | 5.4 |
| Sun 11/2 | vs Wyoming | L 17-45 | 4 | 7 | 1.80 | 0 | — | — | 1.8 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Boise State | L 27-37 | 3 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0.8 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ UNLV | L 27-30 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 3.4 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs San Diego State | W 24-13 | 6 | 14 | 2.30 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 3.1 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ New Mexico2+ TD | W 35-24 | 10 | 38 | 3.80 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 4.9 |
| Sun 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | 12 | 84 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 7 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Nebraska | L 19-55 | 10 | 28 | 2.80 | 0 | 1 | -5 | 2.1 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Utah | L 27-59 | 3 | -4 | -1.30 | 0 | 3 | 22 | 3 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
BYU
2010-2011
Opening stop
- 2
Fresno State
2012-2014
Final stop
Season Progression
201020102011201120122013201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | BYU | 551 | 53.3 | 13.2 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | BYU | 551 | 53.3 | 13.2 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | BYU | 319 | 38.1 | 12.1 | -232 |
| 2011 Regular Season | BYU | 319 | 38.1 | 12.1 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Fresno State | 0 | — | — | -319 |
| 2013 Postseason | Fresno State | 1,097 | 58.1 | 23.6 | 1,097 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Fresno State | 1,097 | 58.1 | 23.6 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Fresno State | 748 | 34.8 | 19.6 | -349 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Fresno State | 748 | 34.8 | 19.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nevada
Win with 155 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
155
Primary metric
155 scrimmage yards and 30.6 usage.
#2
Nevada
177
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
177 scrimmage yards and 40.8 usage.
#3
UTEP
116
Primary metric
Win with 116 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
116 scrimmage yards and 23.3 usage.
#4
New Mexico
109
Primary metric
Win with 109 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
109 scrimmage yards and 25.4 usage.
#5
Wyoming
133
Primary metric
Win with 133 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
133 scrimmage yards and 26.3 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Fresno State
1,097 primary output · 58.1 efficiency · 23.6 usage
64.4
#2
2013 Regular Season · Fresno State
64.4
1,097 primary · 58.1 efficiency · 23.6 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · BYU
40.5
551 primary · 53.3 efficiency · 13.2 usage
Milestones
9
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
2,715
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.