Usage Score
16
Player Dossier
2010-2012Cincinnati
Kenbrell Thompkins
WR • 6'1" • Miami, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kenbrell Thompkins reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.4
Consistency
55.2
Season Value
62.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Cincinnati
10111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Virginia Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kenbrell Thompkins, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Kenbrell Thompkins reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 536 primary output with 75.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Cincinnati
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
41.6
Efficiency
77.4
Usage
16
Consistency
55.2
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 18. Pittsburgh: 48. Unknown: 22. Virginia Tech: 134. Miami (OH): 7. Unknown: 27. Toledo: 38. Louisville: 46. Syracuse: 16. Temple: 79. Rutgers: 38. South Florida: 57. UConn: 11
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 2 by 60. Pittsburgh: 2 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 48.9. Virginia Tech: 7 by 100. Miami (OH): 1 by 46.7. Unknown: 3 by 60. Toledo: 2 by 100. Louisville: 3 by 100. Syracuse: 2 by 53.3. Temple: 2 by 100. Rutgers: 2 by 100. South Florida: 3 by 100. UConn: 2 by 36.7
Split Comparison
Wins46.3 · n=8 · +5.6 vs Losses
Losses40.7 · n=3 · -5.6 vs Wins
First Half42 · n=7 · +0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half41.2 · n=6 · -0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Virginia Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Florida
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/27 | @ Duke | W 48-34 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 12/1 | @ UConn | W 34-17 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs South Florida | W 27-10 | — | 3 | 57 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Rutgers | L 3-10 | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Temple | W 34-10 | — | 2 | 79 | 39.5 | 39.50 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Syracuse | W 35-24 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Louisville | L 31-34 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Toledo | L 23-29 | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Miami (OH) | W 52-14 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Virginia Tech100 receiving yards | W 27-24 | — | 7 | 134 | 19.1 | 19.10 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Fri 9/7 | vs Pittsburgh | W 34-10 | — | 2 | 48 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 42 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2010201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 536 | 75.4 | 22.2 | 536 |
| 2012 Postseason | Cincinnati | 541 | 77.4 | 16 | 5 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 541 | 77.4 | 16 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Virginia Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134
Primary metric
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Florida
114
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Miami (OH)
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 97.3 efficiency score.
#4
NC State
72
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
#5
West Virginia
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 89.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Cincinnati
536 primary output · 75.4 efficiency · 22.2 usage
63.8
#2
2012 Postseason · Cincinnati
62.1
541 primary · 77.4 efficiency · 16 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Cincinnati
62.1
541 primary · 77.4 efficiency · 16 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,077
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.