Usage Score
16.3
Player Dossier
2010-2012Iowa State
Chris Young
WR • 5'11" • Austin, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Chris Young reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71.8
Consistency
56.6
Season Value
61.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Iowa State
10111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Iowa State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Young, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Iowa State. Chris Young reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Iowa State paired 411 primary output with 71.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Iowa State
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
41.1
Efficiency
71.8
Usage
16.3
Consistency
56.6
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 8. Tulsa: 73. Unknown: 86. Kansas State: 24. Oklahoma State: 49. Baylor: 61. Oklahoma: 33. Texas: 23. Kansas: 31. West Virginia: 23
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 1 by 53.3. Tulsa: 7 by 69.5. Unknown: 7 by 81.9. Kansas State: 3 by 53.3. Oklahoma State: 3 by 100. Baylor: 7 by 58.1. Oklahoma: 3 by 73.3. Texas: 1 by 100. Kansas: 4 by 51.7. West Virginia: 2 by 76.7
Split Comparison
Wins55 · n=3 · +28.3 vs Losses
Losses26.7 · n=6 · -28.3 vs Wins
First Half48 · n=5 · +13.8 vs Second Half
Second Half34.2 · n=5 · -13.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/31 | @ Tulsa | L 17-31 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Fri 11/23 | vs West Virginia | L 24-31 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Kansas | W 51-23 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Texas | L 7-33 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Oklahoma | L 20-35 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Baylor | W 35-21 | — | 7 | 61 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Oklahoma State | L 10-31 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Kansas State | L 21-27 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 9/16 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 7 | 86 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 2 | 32 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Tulsa | W 38-23 | — | 7 | 73 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 31 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Iowa State
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2010201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Iowa State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Iowa State | 68 | 69.2 | 9.8 | 68 |
| 2012 Postseason | Iowa State | 411 | 71.8 | 16.3 | 343 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Iowa State | 411 | 71.8 | 16.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
86
Primary metric
86 receiving yards with a 81.9 efficiency score.
#2
Texas
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
#3
Tulsa
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 69.5 efficiency score.
#4
Oklahoma State
49
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Baylor
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 58.1 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Iowa State
411 primary output · 71.8 efficiency · 16.3 usage
61.2
#2
2012 Regular Season · Iowa State
61.2
411 primary · 71.8 efficiency · 16.3 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Iowa State
39.8
68 primary · 69.2 efficiency · 9.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
479
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.