Usage Score
27.8
Player Dossier
2010-2011Arkansas State
Dwayne Frampton
WR • 5'9" • Wilmington, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Dwayne Frampton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.7
Consistency
72
Season Value
68.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Arkansas State
101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Arkansas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dwayne Frampton, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Arkansas State. Dwayne Frampton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 1,003 primary output with 74.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Arkansas State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
83.6
Efficiency
74.7
Usage
27.8
Consistency
72
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 31. Illinois: 99. Memphis: 75. Virginia Tech: 59. Unknown: 100. Western Kentucky: 126. UL Monroe: 147. Florida International: 7. North Texas: 77. Florida Atlantic: 87. Louisiana: 54. Middle Tennessee: 141
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 4 by 51.7. Illinois: 5 by 100. Memphis: 6 by 83.3. Virginia Tech: 6 by 65.6. Unknown: 8 by 83.3. Western Kentucky: 9 by 93.3. UL Monroe: 13 by 75.4. Florida International: 1 by 46.7. North Texas: 6 by 85.6. Florida Atlantic: 10 by 58. Louisiana: 6 by 60. Middle Tennessee: 10 by 94
Split Comparison
Wins89.3 · n=8 · +26.3 vs Losses
Losses63 · n=3 · -26.3 vs Wins
First Half81.7 · n=6 · -3.8 vs Second Half
Second Half85.5 · n=6 · +3.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/9 | @ Northern Illinois | L 20-38 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Middle Tennessee100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-19 | — | 10 | 141 | 14.1 | 14.10 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Louisiana | W 30-21 | — | 6 | 54 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Florida AtlanticHigh volume | W 39-21 | — | 10 | 87 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs North Texas | W 37-14 | — | 6 | 77 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 22 |
| Wed 10/19 | vs Florida International | W 34-16 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ UL Monroe100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-19 | — | 13 | 147 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Western Kentucky100 receiving yards · High volume | W 26-22 | — | 9 | 126 | 13.2 | 14 | 1 | 33 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 8 | 100 | 12.2 | 12.50 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Virginia Tech | L 7-26 | — | 6 | 59 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Memphis | W 47-3 | — | 6 | 75 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Illinois | L 15-33 | — | 5 | 99 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 0 | 65 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas State
2010-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 738 | 70.7 | 24.8 | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Arkansas State | 1,003 | 74.7 | 27.8 | 265 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 1,003 | 74.7 | 27.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Middle Tennessee
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
138
Primary metric
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Middle Tennessee
141
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 94 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
147
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
147 receiving yards with a 75.4 efficiency score.
#4
Western Kentucky
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Illinois
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Arkansas State
1,003 primary output · 74.7 efficiency · 27.8 usage
68.1
#2
2011 Regular Season · Arkansas State
68.1
1,003 primary · 74.7 efficiency · 27.8 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Arkansas State
56.9
738 primary · 70.7 efficiency · 24.8 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
9
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,741
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.