Usage Score
21.5
Player Dossier
2010-2011Temple
WR • 6'4" • Burlington, NJ, USA
Rod Streater reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
21.5
Efficiency
94
Consistency
71
Season Value
62.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Temple
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rod Streater, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Temple. Rod Streater reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Temple paired 481 primary output with 87.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 94 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
45.8
Efficiency
94
Usage
21.5
Consistency
71
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 61. Unknown: 68. Akron: 22. Maryland: 25. Toledo: 43. Ball State: 47. Buffalo: 18. Ohio: 82
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 1 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Akron: 2 by 73.3. Maryland: 2 by 83.3. Toledo: 3 by 95.6. Ball State: 2 by 100. Buffalo: 1 by 100. Ohio: 3 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wyoming
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Temple
2010-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Temple | 481 | 87.7 | 20.8 | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Temple | 366 | 94 | 21.5 | -115 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Temple | 366 | 94 | 21.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88
Primary metric
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio
82
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Kent State
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
68
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wyoming
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Temple
481 primary output · 87.7 efficiency · 20.8 usage
65.9
#2
2011 Postseason · Temple
62.7
366 primary · 94 efficiency · 21.5 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Temple
62.7
366 primary · 94 efficiency · 21.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
847
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Rod Streater quick answers