Usage Score
22.4
Player Dossier
2010-2011East Carolina
Lance Lewis
WR • 6'3" • Concord, NC, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Lance Lewis reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
63
Consistency
66.6
Season Value
53.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · East Carolina
101011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- East Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lance Lewis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · East Carolina. Lance Lewis reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
East Carolina paired 1,116 primary output with 74.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 63 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · East Carolina
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
75
Efficiency
63
Usage
22.4
Consistency
66.6
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 108. Virginia Tech: 17. UAB: 69. North Carolina: 166. Houston: 73. Memphis: 48. Navy: 80. Tulane: 39
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 13 by 55.4. Virginia Tech: 3 by 37.8. UAB: 8 by 57.5. North Carolina: 10 by 100. Houston: 5 by 97.3. Memphis: 6 by 53.3. Navy: 9 by 59.3. Tulane: 6 by 43.3
Split Comparison
Wins59 · n=4 · -32 vs Losses
Losses91 · n=4 · +32 vs Wins
First Half90 · n=4 · +30 vs Second Half
Second Half60 · n=4 · -30 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 10/29 | vs Tulane | W 34-13 | — | 6 | 39 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ NavyHigh volume | W 38-35 | — | 9 | 80 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Memphis | W 35-17 | — | 6 | 48 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Houston | L 3-56 | — | 5 | 73 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 0 | 48 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs North Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-35 | — | 10 | 166 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs UABHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 28-23 | — | 8 | 69 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 2 | 13 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Virginia Tech | L 10-17 | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ South Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | L 37-56 | — | 13 | 108 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 2 | 30 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
East Carolina
2010-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
201020102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | East Carolina | 1,116 | 74.5 | 21.4 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | East Carolina | 1,116 | 74.5 | 21.4 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | East Carolina | 600 | 63 | 22.4 | -516 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
166
Primary metric
166 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
154
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rice
126
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Maryland
137
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 83 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · East Carolina
1,116 primary output · 74.5 efficiency · 21.4 usage
66.3
#2
2010 Regular Season · East Carolina
66.3
1,116 primary · 74.5 efficiency · 21.4 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · East Carolina
53.1
600 primary · 63 efficiency · 22.4 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
10
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,716
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.