Usage Score
16.6
Player Dossier
2023-2025Utah
RB • 6'0" • 185 lbs • Granada Hills, CA, USA
Dijon Stanley leans balanced backfield option traits and 38.8 efficiency.
Usage Score
16.6
Efficiency
38.8
Consistency
54.3
Season Value
52.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · New Mexico State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dijon Stanley, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · New Mexico State. Dijon Stanley leans balanced backfield option traits and 38.8 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
New Mexico State paired 421 primary output with 38.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 38.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Utah, New Mexico State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with 113 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
38.3
Efficiency
38.8
Usage
16.6
Consistency
54.3
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 32. Tulsa: 23. Louisiana Tech: 6. New Mexico: 11. Liberty: 42. Missouri State: 22. Western Kentucky: 27. Kennesaw State: 71. Tennessee: 41. UTEP: 113. Middle Tennessee: 33
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 10 by 33.3. Tulsa: 7 by 23.7. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 20.8. New Mexico: 3 by 62.2. Liberty: 11 by 35.7. Missouri State: 8 by 22.9. Western Kentucky: 8 by 19.1. Kennesaw State: 12 by 62.8. Tennessee: 10 by 34. UTEP: 12 by 89.2. Middle Tennessee: 12 by 23.2
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
89.2 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 24-31 | 8 | 15 | 1.90 | 0 | 4 | 18 | 2.8 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ UTEP100 rush yards | W 34-31 | 11 | 106 | 9.60 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 9.4 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Tennessee | L 9-42 | 7 | 19 | 2.70 | 0 | 3 | 22 | 4.1 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Kennesaw State | L 21-24 | 10 | 61 | 6.10 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 5.9 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Western Kentucky | L 16-35 | 5 | 4 | 0.80 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 3.4 |
| Thu 10/23 | vs Missouri State | L 17-24 | 6 | 11 | 1.80 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 2.8 |
| Tue 10/14 | @ Liberty | L 27-30 | 6 | 19 | 3.20 | 0 | 5 | 23 | 3.8 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ New Mexico | L 20-38 | 2 | 15 | 7.50 | 0 | 1 | -4 | 3.7 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 14-49 | 3 | 7 | 2.30 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1.5 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Tulsa | W 21-14 | 5 | 8 | 1.60 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 3.3 |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 10 | 32 | 3.20 | 0 | — | — | 3.2 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah
2023-2024
Opening stop
New Mexico State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Utah | 22 | 33.9 | 2.3 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Utah | 22 | 33.9 | 2.3 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Utah | 232 | 40 | 6.1 | 210 |
| 2025 Regular Season | New Mexico State | 421 | 38.8 | 16.6 | 189 |
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Win with 113 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
113
Primary metric
113 scrimmage yards and 17.4 usage.
#2
Unknown
184
Primary metric
Game with 184 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
184 scrimmage yards and 16.1 usage.
#3
Arizona
11
Primary metric
Loss with 11 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
11 scrimmage yards and 1.5 usage.
#4
Kennesaw State
71
Primary metric
Loss with 71 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
71 scrimmage yards and 18.8 usage.
#5
Arizona State
15
Primary metric
Win with 15 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
15 scrimmage yards and 10.3 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · New Mexico State
421 primary output · 38.8 efficiency · 16.6 usage
52.2
#2
2024 Regular Season · Utah
28
232 primary · 40 efficiency · 6.1 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Utah
13.1
22 primary · 33.9 efficiency · 2.3 usage
2
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.892
Granada Hills · Granada Hills, CA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
675
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 25 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Dijon Stanley quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit