Usage Score
8.4
Player Dossier
2023-2025USC
RB • 6'0" • 215 lbs • Wichita Falls, TX, USA
A'Marion Peterson leans balanced backfield option traits and 35.4 efficiency.
Usage Score
8.4
Efficiency
47.8
Consistency
35.5
Season Value
36
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
A'Marion Peterson, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · UTSA. A'Marion Peterson leans balanced backfield option traits and 35.4 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
UTSA paired 184 primary output with 35.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 47.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across USC, UTSA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Win with 56 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Scrimmage Yards / G
19.5
Efficiency
47.8
Usage
8.4
Consistency
35.5
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 56. Utah State: 18. Rutgers: 4. Washington: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 14 by 39.1. Utah State: 3 by 62.5. Rutgers: 1 by 41.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
62.5 vs Utah State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
USC
2023-2024
Opening stop
UTSA
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | USC | 14 | 72.9 | 3.4 | — |
| 2024 Postseason | USC | 78 | 47.8 | 8.4 | 64 |
| 2024 Regular Season | USC | 78 | 47.8 | 8.4 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | UTSA | 184 | 35.4 | 8.6 | 106 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UTSA | 184 | 35.4 | 8.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Stanford
Win with 14 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
14
Primary metric
14 scrimmage yards and 3.4 usage.
#2
Texas A&M
56
Primary metric
Win with 56 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
56 scrimmage yards and 26.4 usage.
#3
Florida International
38
Primary metric
Win with 38 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
38 scrimmage yards and 13.8 usage.
#4
East Carolina
39
Primary metric
Win with 39 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
39 scrimmage yards and 19 usage.
#5
Texas A&M
26
Primary metric
Loss with 26 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
26 scrimmage yards and 11.1 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · UTSA
184 primary output · 35.4 efficiency · 8.6 usage
51.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · UTSA
51.6
184 primary · 35.4 efficiency · 8.6 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · USC
46.4
14 primary · 72.9 efficiency · 3.4 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8967
Hirschi · Wichita Falls, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
276
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 15 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
A'Marion Peterson quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit