Usage Score
33.8
Player Dossier
2022-2025Ball State
Tanner Koziol
TE • 6'7" • 240 lbs • Bloomingdale, IL, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Tanner Koziol reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
59.4
Consistency
76.6
Season Value
67
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Ball State
2223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Ball State • Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tanner Koziol, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Ball State. Tanner Koziol reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Ball State paired 839 primary output with 59.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 59.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ball State, Houston.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · Ball State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
69.9
Efficiency
59.4
Usage
33.8
Consistency
76.6
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 60. Miami: 39. Central Michigan: 112. James Madison: 78. Western Michigan: 102. Kent State: 43. Vanderbilt: 68. Northern Illinois: 78. Miami (OH): 49. Buffalo: 95. Bowling Green: 27. Ohio: 88
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 6 by 66.7. Miami: 5 by 52. Central Michigan: 9 by 83. James Madison: 9 by 57.8. Western Michigan: 9 by 75.6. Kent State: 8 by 35.8. Vanderbilt: 9 by 50.4. Northern Illinois: 9 by 57.8. Miami (OH): 4 by 81.7. Buffalo: 11 by 57.6. Bowling Green: 5 by 36. Ohio: 10 by 58.7
Split Comparison
Wins60.5 · n=2 · -12.6 vs Losses
Losses73.1 · n=9 · +12.6 vs Wins
First Half72.3 · n=6 · +4.8 vs Second Half
Second Half67.5 · n=6 · -4.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
83 vs Central Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | @ OhioHigh volume | L 21-42 | — | 10 | 88 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Bowling Green | L 13-38 | — | 5 | 27 | 5.4 | 5.40 | 0 | 9 |
| Wed 11/13 | @ BuffaloHigh volume | L 48-51 | — | 11 | 95 | 8.4 | 8.60 | 1 | 20 |
| Wed 11/6 | vs Miami (OH) | L 21-27 | — | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Northern IllinoisHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 25-23 | — | 9 | 78 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 2 | 18 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ VanderbiltHigh volume | L 14-24 | — | 9 | 68 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Kent StateHigh volume | W 37-35 | — | 8 | 43 | 5.4 | 5.40 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Western Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | L 42-45 | — | 9 | 102 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ James MadisonHigh volume | L 7-63 | — | 9 | 78 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Central Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | L 34-37 | — | 9 | 112 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Miami | L 0-62 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ball State
2022-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Houston
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Ball State | 373 | 63.7 | 12.8 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Ball State | 295 | 58.9 | 19.4 | -78 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Ball State | 839 | 59.4 | 33.8 | 544 |
| 2025 Postseason | Houston | 727 | 64.8 | 30.8 | -112 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Houston | 727 | 64.8 | 30.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100
Primary metric
100 receiving yards with a 95.2 efficiency score.
#2
Central Michigan
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 83 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon State
86
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#4
Western Michigan
102
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 75.6 efficiency score.
#5
Northern Illinois
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 84.8 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Ball State
839 primary output · 59.4 efficiency · 33.8 usage
67
#2
2025 Postseason · Houston
64
727 primary · 64.8 efficiency · 30.8 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Houston
64
727 primary · 64.8 efficiency · 30.8 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
11
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.7859
Nazareth Academy · La Grange Park, IL
- Committed To
- Ball State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,234
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 46 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.