Usage Score
26.4
Player Dossier
2022-2025Western Kentucky
Easton Messer
WR • 5'9" • 190 lbs • Louisville, KY, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Easton Messer reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71
Consistency
76.4
Season Value
66
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
222323242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Western Kentucky • Florida Atlantic
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Easton Messer, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic. Easton Messer reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Florida Atlantic paired 1,029 primary output with 71 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 71 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Western Kentucky, Florida Atlantic.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
85.8
Efficiency
71
Usage
26.4
Consistency
76.4
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Maryland: 87. Unknown: 62. Florida International: 64. Memphis: 131. Rice: 110. UAB: 29. South Florida: 54. Navy: 71. Tulsa: 83. Tulane: 133. UConn: 119. East Carolina: 86
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Maryland: 15 by 38.7. Unknown: 4 by 100. Florida International: 6 by 71.1. Memphis: 9 by 97. Rice: 11 by 66.7. UAB: 4 by 48.3. South Florida: 7 by 51.4. Navy: 8 by 59.2. Tulsa: 6 by 92.2. Tulane: 9 by 98.5. UConn: 11 by 72.1. East Carolina: 10 by 57.3
Split Comparison
Wins74 · n=3 · -19.1 vs Losses
Losses93.1 · n=8 · +19.1 vs Wins
First Half80.5 · n=6 · -10.5 vs Second Half
Second Half91 · n=6 · +10.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs East CarolinaHigh volume | L 3-42 | — | 10 | 86 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs UConn100 receiving yards · High volume | L 45-48 | — | 11 | 119 | 12.3 | 10.80 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Tulane100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-35 | — | 9 | 133 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Tulsa2+ TD | W 40-21 | — | 6 | 83 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 3 | 44 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ NavyHigh volume | L 32-42 | — | 8 | 71 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ South Florida | L 13-48 | — | 7 | 54 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs UAB | W 53-33 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.8 | 7.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Rice100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-21 | — | 11 | 110 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 55 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Memphis100 receiving yards · High volume | L 26-55 | — | 9 | 131 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 0 | 50 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Florida International | L 28-38 | — | 6 | 64 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ MarylandHigh volume | L 7-39 | — | 15 | 87 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Western Kentucky
2022-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Florida Atlantic
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202220232023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 44 | 100 | 2.7 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 484 | 70.8 | 13.1 | 440 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 484 | 70.8 | 13.1 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 793 | 79.8 | 18.3 | 309 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 793 | 79.8 | 18.3 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 1,029 | 71 | 26.4 | 236 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106
Primary metric
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
131
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 97 efficiency score.
#3
Tulane
133
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 98.5 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
116
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 85.9 efficiency score.
#5
Troy
96
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
1,029 primary output · 71 efficiency · 26.4 usage
66
#2
2024 Postseason · Western Kentucky
60.4
793 primary · 79.8 efficiency · 18.3 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
60.4
793 primary · 79.8 efficiency · 18.3 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
8
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,350
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.