Usage Score
17.5
Player Dossier
2022-2025Louisiana Tech
Cyrus Allen
WR • 5'11" • 180 lbs • New Orleans, LA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Cyrus Allen reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
90.4
Consistency
63.3
Season Value
67.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
2223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Louisiana Tech • Texas A&M • Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cyrus Allen, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech. Cyrus Allen reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Louisiana Tech paired 778 primary output with 90.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 90.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Louisiana Tech, Texas A&M, Cincinnati.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Sam Houston
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
70.7
Efficiency
90.4
Usage
17.5
Consistency
63.3
Best Game by takeover score
Jacksonville State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 14. Florida International: 48. North Texas: 82. Nebraska: 102. UTEP: 85. Western Kentucky: 18. Middle Tennessee: 103. New Mexico State: 35. Liberty: 68. Sam Houston: 170. Jacksonville State: 53
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 1 by 93.3. Florida International: 5 by 64. North Texas: 5 by 100. Nebraska: 6 by 100. UTEP: 1 by 100. Western Kentucky: 1 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 7 by 98.1. New Mexico State: 3 by 77.8. Liberty: 5 by 90.7. Sam Houston: 7 by 100. Jacksonville State: 5 by 70.7
Split Comparison
Wins66.5 · n=2 · -5.2 vs Losses
Losses71.7 · n=9 · +5.2 vs Wins
First Half58.2 · n=6 · -27.6 vs Second Half
Second Half85.8 · n=5 · +27.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Sam Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs Sam Houston
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/18 | @ Jacksonville State | L 17-56 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Sam Houston100 receiving yards | L 27-42 | — | 7 | 170 | 20.9 | 24.30 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Liberty | L 30-56 | — | 5 | 68 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 26 |
| Tue 10/24 | vs New Mexico State | L 24-27 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Tue 10/10 | @ Middle Tennessee100 receiving yards | L 23-31 | — | 7 | 103 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 38 |
| Fri 10/6 | vs Western Kentucky | L 28-35 | — | 1 | 18 | 6.5 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ UTEP | W 24-10 | — | 1 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 0 | 85 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Nebraska100 receiving yards | L 14-28 | — | 6 | 102 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs North Texas | L 37-40 | — | 5 | 82 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ SMU | L 14-38 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 8/27 | vs Florida International | W 22-17 | — | 5 | 48 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisiana Tech
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Texas A&M
2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Cincinnati
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 509 | 95.2 | 12.5 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 778 | 90.4 | 17.5 | 269 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 269 | 74.8 | 15.5 | -509 |
| 2025 Postseason | Cincinnati | 660 | 70 | 21.8 | 391 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 660 | 70 | 21.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81
Primary metric
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Sam Houston
170
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
170 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Missouri
121
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Utah
133
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
72
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
778 primary output · 90.4 efficiency · 17.5 usage
67.8
#2
2025 Postseason · Cincinnati
58.4
660 primary · 70 efficiency · 21.8 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Cincinnati
58.4
660 primary · 70 efficiency · 21.8 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.85
Blue Springs South · Blue Springs, MO
- Committed To
- Rice
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
3
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,216
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 41 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.