Usage Score
8.7
Player Dossier
2022-2025Arkansas State
Keyron Crawford
DE • 6'4" • 255 lbs • Memphis, TN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Keyron Crawford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
26.4
Consistency
12.8
Season Value
21.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Auburn
2223232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Arkansas State • Auburn
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Keyron Crawford, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Auburn. Keyron Crawford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Auburn paired 15.5 primary output with 25.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 26.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arkansas State, Auburn.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Arkansas State
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
26.4
Usage
8.7
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 0. Oklahoma: 0. Memphis: 3.5. Unknown: 1. Southern Miss: 0. Massachusetts: 2.5. Troy: 0. Coastal Carolina: 2. UL Monroe: 0. Louisiana: 6. South Alabama: 0. Texas State: 0. Marshall: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 0 by 0. Oklahoma: 6 by 25. Memphis: 6 by 60. Unknown: 2 by 18.3. Southern Miss: 2 by 8.3. Massachusetts: 6 by 50. Troy: 2 by 8.3. Coastal Carolina: 3 by 32.5. UL Monroe: 1 by 4.2. Louisiana: 7 by 79.2. South Alabama: 4 by 16.7. Texas State: 2 by 8.3. Marshall: 3 by 32.5
Split Comparison
Wins1.7 · n=5 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · n=7 · -0.6 vs Wins
First Half1 · n=7 · -0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half1.7 · n=6 · +0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana
Best efficiency game
79.2 vs Louisiana
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/23 | @ Northern Illinois | L 19-21 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Marshall | L 21-35 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Texas State | W 77-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ South Alabama | L 14-21 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Louisiana2+ sacks · Splash game | W 37-17 | 7 | 5 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ UL Monroe | W 34-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Coastal Carolina | L 17-27 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Troy | L 3-37 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ MassachusettsSplash game | W 52-28 | 6 | 4 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Southern Miss | W 44-37 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs MemphisSplash game | L 3-37 | 6 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Oklahoma | L 0-73 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas State
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Auburn
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20222023202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 5 | 21.7 | 4.5 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Arkansas State | 17 | 26.4 | 8.7 | 12 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 17 | 26.4 | 8.7 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Auburn | 1 | 11.3 | 2.4 | -16 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Auburn | 15.5 | 25.4 | 8.9 | 14.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisiana
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 72 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
4
Primary metric
Game with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.2 takeover score.
#3
Ball State
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57 takeover score.
#4
South Alabama
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.6 takeover score.
#5
Memphis
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Auburn
15.5 primary output · 25.4 efficiency · 8.9 usage
27.3
#2
2023 Postseason · Arkansas State
21.4
17 primary · 26.4 efficiency · 8.7 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Arkansas State
21.4
17 primary · 26.4 efficiency · 8.7 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
6
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.82
Sulphur Springs · Sulphur Springs, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
116
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 39 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.