Usage Score
5.8
Player Dossier
2023-2025Oklahoma
LB • 6'1" • 235 lbs • Heartland, TX, USA
Samuel Omosigho shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.8
Efficiency
23.3
Consistency
12.8
Season Value
15.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Oklahoma
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Samuel Omosigho, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Oklahoma. Samuel Omosigho shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.3 disruption score.
Samuel Omosigho played LB for Oklahoma. Across 3 tracked seasons, Samuel Omosigho recorded 97 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Oklahoma.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 9.5 primary output with 23.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 23.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
23.3
Usage
5.8
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 0. Unknown: 2. Michigan: 2. Temple: 3. Auburn: 0. Kent State: 0. Texas: 0. South Carolina: 1. Ole Miss: 1. Tennessee: 0. Alabama: 0. Missouri: 0. LSU: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 3 by 12.5. Unknown: 8 by 53.3. Michigan: 3 by 32.5. Temple: 3 by 42.5. Auburn: 6 by 25. Kent State: 1 by 4.2. Texas: 1 by 4.2. South Carolina: 5 by 30.8. Ole Miss: 1 by 14.2. Tennessee: 5 by 20.8. Alabama: 6 by 25. Missouri: 3 by 12.5. LSU: 5 by 25.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
53.3 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Alabama | L 24-34 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | vs LSU | W 17-13 | 5 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Missouri | W 17-6 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Alabama | W 23-21 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Tennessee | W 33-27 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Ole Miss | L 26-34 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ South Carolina | W 26-7 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Texas | L 6-23 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Kent State | W 44-0 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Auburn | W 24-17 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Temple | W 42-3 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Michigan | W 24-13 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 8 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oklahoma
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 0.5 | 6.8 | 1.7 | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Oklahoma | 6 | 18.9 | 4.8 | 5.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 6 | 18.9 | 4.8 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Oklahoma | 9.5 | 23.3 | 5.8 | 3.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 9.5 | 23.3 | 5.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Houston
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.8 takeover score.
#2
Temple
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 48.6 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.5 takeover score.
#4
South Carolina
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.2 takeover score.
#5
Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 37.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Oklahoma
9.5 primary output · 23.3 efficiency · 5.8 usage
15.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · Oklahoma
15.4
9.5 primary · 23.3 efficiency · 5.8 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Oklahoma
12.5
6 primary · 18.9 efficiency · 4.8 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9647
Crandall · Crandall, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
97
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 30 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.