Usage Score
24.8
Player Dossier
2022-2025Cincinnati
QB • 6'3" • 235 lbs • Corinth, TX, USA
Brendan Sorsby is a pass-first distributor with 28.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
24.8
Efficiency
63.4
Consistency
77.4
Season Value
65.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brendan Sorsby, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Brendan Sorsby is a pass-first distributor with 28.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 3,366 primary output with 70.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 63.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Indiana, Cincinnati.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
271.5
Efficiency
63.4
Usage
24.8
Consistency
77.4
Best Game by takeover score
TCU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 388. Pittsburgh: 293. Miami (OH): 196. Houston: 192. Texas Tech: 478. UCF: 245. Arizona State: 232. Colorado: 228. West Virginia: 327. Iowa State: 207. Kansas State: 219. TCU: 253
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 36 by 70.2. Pittsburgh: 46 by 55.8. Miami (OH): 41 by 55.4. Houston: 18 by 73.3. Texas Tech: 57 by 70.6. UCF: 47 by 50.5. Arizona State: 38 by 63.5. Colorado: 39 by 64.2. West Virginia: 50 by 64.3. Iowa State: 32 by 71.5. Kansas State: 45 by 54.5. TCU: 46 by 66.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Best efficiency game
73.3 vs Houston
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs TCUDual-threat | L 13-20 | 21 | 34 | 160 | 61.8 | 0 | 1 | 66.7 | 12 | 93 | 7.80 | 1 | 25 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Kansas State | L 15-41 | 21 | 39 | 200 | 53.8 | 2 | 1 | 54.5 | 6 | 19 | 3.20 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Iowa StateDual-threat | L 17-34 | 10 | 18 | 66 | 55.6 | 0 | 0 | 71.5 | 14 | 141 | 10.10 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs West Virginia | L 24-31 | 25 | 36 | 279 | 69.4 | 1 | 1 | 64.3 | 14 | 48 | 3.40 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 10/27 | @ Colorado | L 23-34 | 16 | 30 | 180 | 53.3 | 2 | 0 | 64.2 | 9 | 48 | 5.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Arizona State | W 24-14 | 23 | 31 | 206 | 74.2 | 0 | 1 | 63.5 | 7 | 26 | 3.70 | 2 | 14 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ UCF | W 19-13 | 25 | 38 | 241 | 65.8 | 1 | 2 | 50.5 | 9 | 4 | 0.40 | 1 | 6 |
| Sun 9/29 | @ Texas Tech300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 41-44 | 31 | 45 | 426 | 68.9 | 4 | 1 | 70.6 | 12 | 52 | 4.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Houston3+ TD | W 34-0 | 12 | 15 | 188 | 80.0 | 2 | 0 | 73.3 | 3 | 4 | 1.30 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Miami (OH) | W 27-16 | 21 | 34 | 186 | 61.8 | 1 | 0 | 55.4 | 7 | 10 | 1.40 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Pittsburgh3+ TD | L 27-28 | 22 | 38 | 298 | 57.9 | 3 | 0 | 55.8 | 8 | -5 | -0.60 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown300-yard game · 3+ TD | — | 22 | 31 | 383 | 71.0 | 2 | 0 | 70.2 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 12 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Indiana
2022-2023
Opening stop
Cincinnati
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Indiana | 0 | 23.6 | 5.9 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Indiana | 1,873 | 57.8 | 30.6 | 1,873 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 3,258 | 63.4 | 24.8 | 1,385 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 3,366 | 70.6 | 28.5 | 108 |
#1 Featured game
Texas Tech
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
478
Primary metric
478 total offense with 70.6 efficiency.
#2
Kansas
440
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
440 total offense with 70.7 efficiency.
#3
TCU
341
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
341 total offense with 75 efficiency.
#4
Illinois
342
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
342 total offense with 64.7 efficiency.
#5
Bowling Green
373
Primary metric
Win with 373 yards of offense and 82 efficiency.
373 total offense with 82 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Cincinnati
3,366 primary output · 70.6 efficiency · 28.5 usage
70.1
#2
2024 Regular Season · Cincinnati
65.3
3,258 primary · 63.4 efficiency · 24.8 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Indiana
53.4
1,873 primary · 57.8 efficiency · 30.6 usage
16
250+ passing yards
8
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
23
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2026 · Rating 0.82
Australia · Australia, AUST
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
8,497
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 35 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Brendan Sorsby quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit