Usage Score
0.7
Player Dossier
2022-2025UTSA
Alpha Khan
CB • 6'1" • 175 lbs • Katy, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Alpha Khan shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 4.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
4.2
Consistency
100
Season Value
35
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UTSA
22232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alpha Khan, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UTSA. Alpha Khan shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 4.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
UTSA paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
4
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
4.2
Usage
0.7
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 0. Colorado State: 0. Rice: 0. North Texas: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 1 by 4.2. Colorado State: 1 by 4.2. Rice: 1 by 4.2. North Texas: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Wins0 · n=2 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=2 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0 · n=2 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · n=2 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
4.2 vs North Texas
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2022202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Primary metric
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.7 takeover score.
#2
North Texas
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.6 takeover score.
#3
Rice
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.6 takeover score.
#4
Colorado State
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.6 takeover score.
#5
Kennesaw State
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 0 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · UTSA
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.7 usage
35
#2
2024 Regular Season · UTSA
33.3
0 primary · 0 efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · UTSA
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
4
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 5 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.