Usage Score
14.7
Player Dossier
2023-2025Cincinnati
WR • 6'3" • 203 lbs • Cincinnati, OH, USA
Sterling Berkhalter reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14.7
Efficiency
80.1
Consistency
67.7
Season Value
65.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Wake Forest
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sterling Berkhalter, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Wake Forest. Sterling Berkhalter reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 416 primary output with 80.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Cincinnati, Wake Forest.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
34.7
Efficiency
80.1
Usage
14.7
Consistency
67.7
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 34. Kennesaw State: 34. Unknown: 72. NC State: 43. Georgia Tech: 50. Oregon State: 26. SMU: 58. Florida State: 13. Virginia: 9. North Carolina: 19. Delaware: 42. Duke: 16
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 5 by 45.3. Kennesaw State: 3 by 75.6. Unknown: 2 by 100. NC State: 3 by 95.6. Georgia Tech: 2 by 100. Oregon State: 3 by 57.8. SMU: 5 by 77.3. Florida State: 1 by 86.7. Virginia: 1 by 60. North Carolina: 2 by 63.3. Delaware: 2 by 100. Duke: 1 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Duke
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | @ Mississippi State | W 43-29 | — | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Duke | L 32-49 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Delaware | W 52-14 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs North Carolina | W 28-12 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 11/9 | @ Virginia | W 16-9 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Florida State | L 7-42 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs SMU | W 13-12 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Oregon State | W 39-14 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Georgia Tech | L 29-30 | — | 2 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 39 |
| Thu 9/11 | vs NC State | L 24-34 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 72 | 36 | 36 | 1 | 51 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Kennesaw State | W 10-9 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 18 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Cincinnati
2023-2024
Opening stop
Wake Forest
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 191 | 74.3 | 8.1 | 191 |
| 2025 Postseason | Wake Forest | 416 | 80.1 | 14.7 | 225 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 416 | 80.1 | 14.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Duke
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
9
Primary metric
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
72
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
70
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Houston
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
58
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 77.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Wake Forest
416 primary output · 80.1 efficiency · 14.7 usage
65.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · Wake Forest
65.6
416 primary · 80.1 efficiency · 14.7 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Cincinnati
40.7
191 primary · 74.3 efficiency · 8.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
607
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 21 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Sterling Berkhalter quick answers