Usage Score
40.4
Player Profile
Casey Reynolds
WR • 6'2" • 192 lbs • Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Casey Reynolds reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
93.3
Consistency
41.6
Season Value
68.8
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Army
22232424
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Primary stop by seasons
- Army
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Army
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Casey Reynolds, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Army. Casey Reynolds reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Army paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 93.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Army
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
34.5
Efficiency
93.3
Usage
40.4
Consistency
41.6
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana Tech: 13. Unknown: 22. Florida Atlantic: 44. Rice: 31. Temple: 27. UAB: 84. East Carolina: 85. Air Force: 24. North Texas: 0. Notre Dame: 11. UTSA: 81. Tulane: 9. Navy: 18
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 86.7. Unknown: 1 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 100. Rice: 2 by 100. Temple: 1 by 100. UAB: 2 by 100. East Carolina: 3 by 100. Air Force: 1 by 100. Notre Dame: 1 by 73.3. UTSA: 4 by 100. Tulane: 1 by 60. Navy: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins39.8 · n=10 · +25.3 vs Losses
Losses14.5 · n=2 · -25.3 vs Wins
First Half43.7 · n=7 · +19.9 vs Second Half
Second Half23.8 · n=6 · -19.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
100 vs Navy
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/29 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 27-6 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 12/14 | vs Navy | L 13-31 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Tulane | W 35-14 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs UTSA | W 29-24 | — | 4 | 81 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Notre Dame | L 14-49 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ North Texas | W 14-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Air Force | W 20-3 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs East Carolina | W 45-28 | — | 3 | 85 | 28.3 | 28.30 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs UAB | W 44-10 | — | 2 | 84 | 42 | 42 | 1 | 50 |
| Thu 9/26 | @ Temple | W 42-14 | — | 1 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Rice | W 37-14 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 24-7 | — | 1 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 1 | 44 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2022-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
2022202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Army | 237 | 75.1 | 29.1 | 237 |
| 2024 Postseason | Army | 449 | 93.3 | 40.4 | 212 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Army | 449 | 93.3 | 40.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84
Primary metric
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida Atlantic
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTSA
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
69
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Army
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2024 Postseason · Army
68.8
449 primary · 93.3 efficiency · 40.4 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Army
68.8
449 primary · 93.3 efficiency · 40.4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
686
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.