Usage Score
19.2
Player Dossier
2021-2025Texas State
Ashtyn Hawkins
WR • 5'10" • 168 lbs • Desoto, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Ashtyn Hawkins reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
87.4
Consistency
60.2
Season Value
66.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Texas State
21222323242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Texas State • Baylor
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ashtyn Hawkins, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Texas State. Ashtyn Hawkins reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Texas State paired 874 primary output with 87.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 87.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas State, Baylor.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Texas State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
67.2
Efficiency
87.4
Usage
19.2
Consistency
60.2
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 55. Baylor: 58. UTSA: 41. Unknown: 38. Nevada: 49. Southern Miss: 101. Louisiana: 93. UL Monroe: 15. Troy: 57. Georgia Southern: 54. Coastal Carolina: 17. Arkansas State: 165. South Alabama: 131
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 3 by 100. Baylor: 5 by 77.3. UTSA: 3 by 91.1. Unknown: 3 by 84.4. Nevada: 6 by 54.4. Southern Miss: 5 by 100. Louisiana: 8 by 77.5. UL Monroe: 1 by 100. Troy: 4 by 95. Georgia Southern: 2 by 100. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 56.7. Arkansas State: 8 by 100. South Alabama: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins66.1 · n=7 · -8.5 vs Losses
Losses74.6 · n=5 · +8.5 vs Wins
First Half62.1 · n=7 · -11.0 vs Second Half
Second Half73.2 · n=6 · +11.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/26 | @ Rice | W 45-21 | — | 3 | 55 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 0 | 32 |
| Sun 11/26 | vs South Alabama100 receiving yards | W 52-44 | — | 5 | 131 | 26.2 | 26.20 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Arkansas State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 31-77 | — | 8 | 165 | 20.6 | 20.60 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Coastal Carolina | L 23-31 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Georgia Southern | W 45-24 | — | 2 | 54 | 17.3 | 27 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Troy | L 13-31 | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs UL Monroe | W 21-20 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ LouisianaHigh volume | L 30-34 | — | 8 | 93 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Southern Miss100 receiving yards | W 50-36 | — | 5 | 101 | 20.2 | 20.20 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Nevada | W 35-24 | — | 6 | 49 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ UTSA | L 13-20 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Baylor | W 42-31 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 31 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas State
2021-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Baylor
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2021202220232023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas State | 284 | 49.8 | 19.6 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas State | 582 | 63.2 | 26 | 298 |
| 2023 Postseason | Texas State | 874 | 87.4 | 19.2 | 292 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas State | 874 | 87.4 | 19.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Baylor | 567 | 80 | 20.8 | -307 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Baylor | 567 | 80 | 20.8 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Baylor | 621 | 67 | 16.4 | 54 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
74
Primary metric
74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
145
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
145 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#3
Georgia State
108
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Air Force
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arkansas State
165
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
165 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Texas State
874 primary output · 87.4 efficiency · 19.2 usage
66.7
#2
2023 Regular Season · Texas State
66.7
874 primary · 87.4 efficiency · 19.2 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Baylor
59.3
567 primary · 80 efficiency · 20.8 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,928
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 56 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.