Usage Score
5.1
Player Dossier
2021-2025Texas
LB • 6'3" • 249 lbs • San Antonio, TX, USA
Trey Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.1
Efficiency
21
Consistency
20.2
Season Value
17.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trey Moore, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · UTSA. Trey Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21 disruption score.
Trey Moore played LB for UTSA and Texas. Across 5 tracked seasons, Trey Moore recorded 167 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
UTSA paired 35.5 primary output with 41.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 21 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UTSA, Texas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
21
Usage
5.1
Consistency
20.2
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 0. San José State: 0. UTEP: 0. Sam Houston: 2. Florida: 0.5. Oklahoma: 0. Kentucky: 4. Mississippi State: 1. Vanderbilt: 3. Georgia: 0. Arkansas: 0.5. Texas A&M: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 4 by 16.7. San José State: 2 by 8.3. UTEP: 3 by 12.5. Sam Houston: 2 by 28.3. Florida: 2 by 13.3. Oklahoma: 1 by 4.2. Kentucky: 5 by 60.8. Mississippi State: 3 by 22.5. Vanderbilt: 3 by 42.5. Georgia: 2 by 8.3. Arkansas: 5 by 25.8. Texas A&M: 2 by 8.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kentucky
Best efficiency game
60.8 vs Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Texas A&M | W 27-17 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Arkansas | W 52-37 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/16 | @ Georgia | L 10-35 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Vanderbilt | W 34-31 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Mississippi State | W 45-38 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ KentuckySplash game | W 16-13 | 5 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Oklahoma | W 23-6 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Florida | L 21-29 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/21 | vs Sam Houston | W 55-0 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs UTEP | W 27-10 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs San José State | W 38-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Ohio State | L 7-14 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2021-2023
Opening stop
Texas
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | 4.2 | 0.6 | — |
| 2022 Postseason | UTSA | 25.5 | 34.8 | 14.5 | 25.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 25.5 | 34.8 | 14.5 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 35.5 | 41.9 | 13.2 | 10 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas | 18 | 20.6 | 7.1 | -17.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas | 18 | 20.6 | 7.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas | 11 | 21 | 5.1 | -7 |
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 65.8 takeover score.
#2
Troy
6.5
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
6.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.8 takeover score.
#3
UAB
7
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7 disruption/tackle impact with 64.6 takeover score.
#4
Arizona State
4.5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.5 takeover score.
#5
Texas State
6
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 62.9 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · UTSA
35.5 primary output · 41.9 efficiency · 13.2 usage
45.9
#2
2022 Postseason · UTSA
39.1
25.5 primary · 34.8 efficiency · 14.5 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · UTSA
39.1
25.5 primary · 34.8 efficiency · 14.5 usage
5
Impact games
13
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9498
St. John Bosco · Bellflower, CA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
167
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 54 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.